Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36703889›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Combining with lab-on-chip technology and multi-organ fusion strategy to estimate post-mortem interval of rat.

Qiu-Xiang Du, Shuai Zhang, Fei-Hao Long, Xiao-Jun Lu, Liang Wang, Jie Cao, Qian-Qian Jin, Kang Ren, Ji Zhang, Ping Huang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Qiu-Xiang DuShanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China.
Shuai ZhangSchool of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Jinzhong, Shanxi, China.
Fei-Hao LongSchool of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Jinzhong, Shanxi, China.
Xiao-Jun LuCriminal Investigation Detachment, Baotou Public Security Bureau, Baotou, Inner Mongolia, China.
Liang WangNational Center for Liver Cancer, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Jie CaoSchool of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Jinzhong, Shanxi, China.
Qian-Qian JinSchool of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Jinzhong, Shanxi, China.
Kang RenSchool of Forensic Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, Jinzhong, Shanxi, China.
Ji ZhangShanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China.
Ping HuangShanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China.
Jun-Hong SunShanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The estimation of post-mortem interval (PMI) is one of the most important problems in forensic pathology all the time. Although many classical methods can be used to estimate time since death, accurate and rapid estimation of PMI is still a difficult task in forensic practice, so the estimation of PMI requires a faster, more accurate, and more convenient method. Materials and methods: In this study, an experimental method, lab-on-chip, is used to analyze the characterizations of polypeptide fragments of the lung, liver, kidney, and skeletal muscle of rats at defined time points after death (0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, and 30 days). Then, machine learning algorithms (base model: LR, SVM, RF, GBDT, and MLPC; ensemble model: stacking, soft voting, and soft-weighted voting) are applied to predict PMI with single organ. Multi-organ fusion strategy is designed to predict PMI based on multiple organs. Then, the ensemble pruning algorithm determines the best combination of multi-organ. Results: The kidney is the best single organ for predicting the time of death, and its internal and external accuracy is 0.808 and 0.714, respectively. Multi-organ fusion strategy dramatically improves the performance of PMI estimation, and its internal and external accuracy is 0.962 and 0.893, respectively. Finally, the best organ combination determined by the ensemble pruning algorithm is all organs, such as lung, liver, kidney, and skeletal muscle. Conclusion: Lab-on-chip is feasible to detect polypeptide fragments and multi-organ fusion is more accurate than single organ for PMI estimation.

Indexed as

forensic pathologylab-on-chipmachine learningmulti-organ fusionpost-mortem interval

Identifiers

PMID36703889
PMCPMC9871555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.