ArticleTherapeutic advances in urology
Insights from the AQUA Registry: a retrospective study of anticholinergic polypharmacy in the United States.
Article in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anticholinergic (ACH) burden is a risk factor for negative health outcomes among older adults. Several medications contribute to ACH burden, including antimuscarinics used to manage overactive bladder (OAB). Objectives: This study aimed to understand the extent of ACH burden in an OAB population in the United States. Design: Non-interventional retrospective analysis. Methods: Adults with OAB whose care providers participated in the American Urological Association Quality (AQUA) Registry between 2014 and 2020 were included in this study. An adapted version of the Pharmacy Quality Alliance (PQA) measure of anticholinergic polypharmacy (poly-ACH) was used to assess ACH burden. The primary outcome was the annual prevalence of poly-ACH, and a secondary outcome was the percentage of patients taking 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or ⩾ 5 ACH medications by calendar year. Analyses were stratified by age category at diagnosis and sex. Results: The sample comprised 552,840 patients with OAB. The mean age at initial OAB diagnosis was 65.7 years (58.2% male; 57.4% white). Prevalence of poly-ACH was highest in 2015 (3.7%) and lowest in 2020 (1.9%). Patients prescribed no ACH medications made up the largest proportion of each cohort, while those prescribed five or more comprised the smallest. The trend of decreasing proportions of patients taking increasing numbers of ACH medications was consistent. The proportion of patients prescribed no ACH medications increased from 63.3% in 2014 to 74.6% in 2020. The percentage of those prescribed three or more ACHs remained largely unchanged. Poly-ACH was highest among younger individuals (< 65 years of age) and females; temporal trends were similar overall and within each age and sex stratum. Conclusion: In this study, poly-ACH in patients with OAB was relatively infrequent and decreased over the study period. Further evaluation of poly-ACH is needed to assess whether the study findings reflect increased awareness of the negative effects of poly-ACH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.