ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2023
Treatment Outcome Comparison Between two 3-Dimensional Plates (Y-Shaped Plate Versus Trapezoidal Condylar Plate) in Management of Mandible Condylar Fracture: A Randomized Control Trial.
Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Open surgical approach to fractures of the mandibular condyle: surgical technique and associated complications.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Which of the 37 Plates Is the Most Mechanically Appropriate for a Low-Neck Fracture of the Mandibular Condyle? A Strength Testing.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Which of 51 Plate Designs Can Most Stably Fixate the Fragments in a Fracture of the Mandibular Condyle Base?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To compare the treatment outcomes (clinical, functional and radiographical) using the two different 3-Dimensional plates in open reduction internal fixation of mandibular condylar fracture (MCF). Assessment of ease of fixation and fixation time were also performed. Methodology: 20 MCF patients were divided equally into two groups (Group A: Trapezoidal Condylar Plate and Group B: Y-shaped plate) and the treatment outcomes were compared. Intraoperatively time required for fixation was also compared. The patients were followed up at different timelines till 3 months. Result: Baseline parameters had statistically insignificant distribution in both groups implying effective randomization and balanced confounding factors. Intraoperatively, adequate anatomical reduction was achieved in both groups with statistically insignificant difference in time required for fixation. Postoperatively, no statistically significant difference was found in radiographic and functional parameters. None of the patients in either group reported with facial nerve injury, condylar resorption, Temporomandibular Disorders. However, 02 patients in Group A and 01 patient in Group B presented with infection, parotid fistula, and hardware failure respectively with statistically insignificant difference. Conclusion: This study concluded that the treatment outcomes were satisfactory with the use of both 3-D plate, but further studies with larger sample size and longer follow up are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.