ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023
Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation following transarterial chemoembolisation combined with sorafenib for intermediate stage recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Significance of Up-to-Seven Criteria Versus Milan Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Resection or Locoregional Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of therapies for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Article
- Radiofrequency ablation for peribiliary hepatocellular carcinoma: propensity score matching analysis.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Tissue Ablation: Applications and Perspectives.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2024Review
- New insights into mechanisms and interventions of locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2024Article
- Addition of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Showed Better Efficacy for Infiltrative Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy and Lenvatinib: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The evidence of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) following transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) combined with sorafenib for intermediate-stage recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) is limited. Patient responses to this treatment vary because of the heterogeneous nature of RHCC, making it important to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from this combination therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of RFA following TACE and sorafenib for the intermediate-stage RHCC. Methods: This retrospective, multicentre, cohort study included 363 patients with intermediate-stage RHCC underwent TACE combined with sorafenib (TACE-sorafenib group) or RFA following TACE and sorafenib (TACE-sorafenib + RFA group) between January 01, 2009 to December 31, 2015 from four institutions in China. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and efficacy of patients were compared between the two groups by propensity score-matching (PSM). Findings: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 97.7%, 83.7%, 54.7% in TACE-sorafenib + RFA group, and 93.3%, 57.0%, 32.7% in TACE-sorafenib group. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 85.3%, 58.0%, 26.9% in TACE-sorafenib + RFA group, and 55.3%, 30.7%, 15.3% in TACE-sorafenib group. Compared with the TACE-sorafenib group, the TACE-sorafenib + RFA group had significantly longer OS (HR, 0.54; 95%CI, 0.40-0.73; Interpretation: Our findings suggest that addition of RFA following TACE and sorafenib combination was superior to TACE combined with sorafenib for intermediate-stage RHCC, resulting in longer OS and PFS. Patients who had good response to TACE and achieved downstaging successfully could not benefit from the RFA therapy. Funding: This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81627803), Chen Xiao-Ping Science and Technology Development Fund (CXPJJH1200009-06).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.