Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36703215›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in zoology2023

A pilot study to estimate the population size of endangered Galápagos marine iguanas using drones.

Andrea Varela-Jaramillo, Gonzalo Rivas-Torres, Juan M Guayasamin, Sebastian Steinfartz, Amy MacLeod

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in zoology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea Varela-JaramilloInstitute of Biology, Molecular Evolution and Systematics of Animals, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0092-9915
Gonzalo Rivas-TorresLaboratorio de Biología Evolutiva, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales COCIBA, Instituto Biósfera, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Calle Diego de Robles s/n y Pampite, Cumbayá, Pichincha, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2704-8288
Juan M GuayasaminLaboratorio de Biología Evolutiva, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales COCIBA, Instituto Biósfera, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Calle Diego de Robles s/n y Pampite, Cumbayá, Pichincha, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0098-978X
Sebastian SteinfartzInstitute of Biology, Molecular Evolution and Systematics of Animals, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5347-3969
Amy MacLeodInstitute of Biology, Molecular Evolution and Systematics of Animals, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany. ms.amymacleod@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6726-9376

Funding

Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst Deutscher Akademischer AustauschdienstGalapagos Science Center Galapagos Science CenterInternational Iguana Foundation International Iguana FoundationSwiss Friends of the Galapagos Swiss Friends of the GalapagosUniversidad San Francisco de Quito Universidad San Francisco de QuitoUniversität Leipzig Universität Leipzig
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge-scale species monitoring remains a significant conservation challenge. Given the ongoing biodiversity crisis, the need for reliable and efficient methods has never been greater. Drone-based techniques have much to offer in this regard: they allow access to otherwise unreachable areas and enable the rapid collection of non-invasive field data. Herein, we describe the development of a drone-based method for the estimation of population size in Galápagos marine iguanas, Amblyrhynchus cristatus. As a large-bodied lizard that occurs in open coastal terrain, this endemic species is an ideal candidate for drone surveys. Almost all Amblyrhynchus subspecies are Endangered or Critically Endangered according to the IUCN yet since several colonies are inaccessible by foot, ground- based methods are unable to address the critical need for better census data. In order to establish a drone-based approach to estimate population size of marine iguanas, we surveyed in January 2021 four colonies on three focal islands (San Cristobal, Santa Fe and Espanola) using three techniques: simple counts (the standard method currently used by conservation managers), capture mark-resight (CMR), and drone-based counts. The surveys were performed within a 4-day window under similar ambient conditions. We then compared the approaches in terms of feasibility, outcome and effort.

resultsThe highest population-size estimates were obtained using CMR, and drone-based counts were on average 14% closer to CMR estimates-and 17-35% higher-than those obtained by simple counts. In terms of field-time, drone-surveys can be faster than simple counts, but image analyses were highly time consuming.

conclusionThough CMR likely produces superior estimates, it cannot be performed in most cases due to lack of access and knowledge regarding colonies. Drone-based surveys outperformed ground-based simple counts in terms of outcome and this approach is therefore suitable for use across the range of the species. Moreover, the aerial approach is currently the only credible solution for accessing and surveying marine iguanas at highly remote colonies. The application of citizen science and other aids such as machine learning will alleviate the issue regarding time needed to analyze the images.

Indexed as

Aerial photographyConservationDronesMonitoringPopulation surveySurvey methodsTechnologyUAVs

Identifiers

PMID36703215
PMCPMC9878759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.