Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36703174›Full record

Trial reportJournal of foot and ankle research2023

A randomised feasibility study of serial magnetic resonance imaging to reduce treatment times in Charcot neuroarthropathy in people with diabetes (CADOM).

Catherine Gooday, Frances Game, Jim Woodburn, Fiona Poland, Erika Sims, Ketan Dhatariya, Lee Shepstone, Garry Barton, Wendy Hardeman

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Controversies in the management of active Charcot neuroarthropathy.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Catherine GoodaySchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK. catherine.gooday@nnuh.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5026-6788
Frances GameDepartment of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK.
Jim WoodburnSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia.
Fiona PolandInstitute for Volunteering Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Erika SimsNorwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Ketan DhatariyaElsie Bertram Diabetes Centre, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK.
Lee ShepstoneNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Garry BartonNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Wendy HardemanSchool of Health Sciences - Behavioural and Implementation Science Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
University of East Anglia · GBGriffith University · AUUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Research Trainees Coordinating Centre ICA-CDRF-2015-01-050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aims to explore the feasibility of using serial MRI without contrast in the monitoring of Charcot neuroarthropathy to reduce duration of immobilisation of the foot, in order to decide whether a large-scale trial is warranted.

methodsA multicentre, randomised, prospective, two arm, open, feasibility study (CADOM) of people with diabetes with a suspected or confirmed diagnosis of Charcot neuroarthropathy. Participants were randomised (1:1) to 'standard care plus', including repeated foot temperature measurements and X-rays, or the intervention arm, with additional three-monthly MRI, until remission of Charcot neuroarthropathy or a maximum 12 months (active phase). Participants were then followed-up for a further 6 months, post remission to monitor for relapse of the Charcot neuroarthropathy (follow-up phase). Feasibility outcomes were recruitment, retention, data completeness, adherence to study procedures and safety of the intervention MRI. We also collected clinical efficacy outcomes, this included time in cast/off-loading device which will be the primary outcome of a future definitive trial. Finally, we collected patient reported outcomes, and data on health and social care usage.

resultsOne-hundred and five people were assessed for eligibility at five sites. 64/105 potential participants meet the eligibility criteria to participate in the study. Forty-three participants were randomised: 20 to standard care plus and 23 to MRI intervention. The main reason for ineligibility was a previous episode of Charcot neuroarthropathy. Thirteen participants were withdrawn post-randomisation due to an alternative diagnosis being made. Of the remaining 30 participants, 19 achieved remission, 6 had not gone into remission at the end of the 12 month active phase so exited the study. Five participants were lost to follow-up. Of the MRIs that were not disrupted by COVID-19 pandemic 26/31 (84%) were completed. For the visits that were conducted face-to-face, completion rates of patient-reported outcome measures were between 71 and 100%. There were no safety incidents associated with the intervention MRI. As this was a feasibility study it was not designed to test the effectiveness of serial MRI in diagnosing remission. The time in cast/off-loading device was 235 (±108.3) days for the standard care plus arm compared to 292 (±177.4) days for the intervention arm. There was no statistical difference in the time in cast/off-loading device between the two arms of the study: Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.405 (95% CI 0.140-1.172), p = 0.096. DISCUSSION: The findings support a definitive randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of MRI in diagnosing remission in Charcot neuroarthropathy. The rates of recruitment, retention, data, and MRI completeness show that a definitive study is feasible. STUDY REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, 74101606 . Registered on 6 November 2017.

Indexed as

COVID-19Diabetes MellitusFeasibility StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPandemicsProspective StudiesCharcot neuroarthropathyDiabetesFeasibility studyMRIRemissionTemperature monitoringX-ray

Identifiers

PMID36703174
PMCPMC9878485
OpenAlexW4318065832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.