Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36703154›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Entity and relation extraction from clinical case reports of COVID-19: a natural language processing approach.

Shaina Raza, Brian Schwartz

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shaina RazaPublic Health Ontario (PHO), Toronto, ON, Canada. shaina.raza@oahpp.ca.
Brian SchwartzPublic Health Ontario (PHO), Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtracting relevant information about infectious diseases is an essential task. However, a significant obstacle in supporting public health research is the lack of methods for effectively mining large amounts of health data.

objectiveThis study aims to use natural language processing (NLP) to extract the key information (clinical factors, social determinants of health) from published cases in the literature.

methodsThe proposed framework integrates a data layer for preparing a data cohort from clinical case reports; an NLP layer to find the clinical and demographic-named entities and relations in the texts; and an evaluation layer for benchmarking performance and analysis. The focus of this study is to extract valuable information from COVID-19 case reports.

resultsThe named entity recognition implementation in the NLP layer achieves a performance gain of about 1-3% compared to benchmark methods. Furthermore, even without extensive data labeling, the relation extraction method outperforms benchmark methods in terms of accuracy (by 1-8% better). A thorough examination reveals the disease's presence and symptoms prevalence in patients.

conclusionsA similar approach can be generalized to other infectious diseases. It is worthwhile to use prior knowledge acquired through transfer learning when researching other infectious diseases.

Indexed as

COVID-19Natural Language ProcessingHumansPublicationsArtificial intelligenceCOVID-19Data cohortNamed entityNatural language processingRelation extractionTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID36703154
PMCPMC9879259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.