Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36703134›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2023

Gaze-based attention refocusing training in virtual reality for adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Benjamin Selaskowski, Laura Marie Asché, Annika Wiebe, Kyra Kannen, Behrem Aslan, Thiago Morano Gerding, Dario Sanchez, Ulrich Ettinger, Markus Kölle, Silke Lux and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Detecting Feigned Pain Using an Eye-Tracker Integrated Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin SelaskowskiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Laura Marie AschéDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Annika WiebeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Kyra KannenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Behrem AslanDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Thiago Morano GerdingDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Dario SanchezDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Ulrich EttingerDepartment of Psychology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Markus KölleDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Silke LuxDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Alexandra PhilipsenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Niclas BraunDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany. niclas.braun@ukbonn.de.
University Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

BONFOR O-128.0098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is characterized by substantial interindividual heterogeneity that challenges the systematic assessment and treatment. Considering mixed evidence from previous neurofeedback research, we present a novel feedback system that relies on gaze behavior to detect signs of inattention while performing a neuropsychological attention task in a virtual seminar room. More specifically, an audiovisual feedback was given whenever participants averted their gaze from the given task.

methodsEighteen adults with ADHD and 18 healthy controls performed a continuous performance task (CPT) in virtual reality under three counterbalanced conditions in which either gaze-based feedback, sham feedback, or no feedback was provided. In all conditions, phases of high and low virtual distraction alternated. CPT errors and reaction times, proportions of gaze dwell times (e.g., task focus or distraction focus), saccade characteristics, EEG theta/beta ratios, head movements, and an experience sampling of ADHD symptoms were analyzed.

resultsWhile patients can be discriminated well from healthy controls in that they showed more omission errors, higher reaction times, higher distraction-related dwell times, and more head movements, the feedback did not immediately improve task performance. It was also indicated that sham feedback was rather associated with an aggravation of symptoms in patients.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate sufficient suitability and specificity for this holistic ADHD symptom assessment. Regarding the feedback, a single-session training was insufficient to achieve learning effects based on the proposed metacognitive strategies. Future longitudinal, multi-session trials should conclusively examine the therapeutic efficacy of gaze-based virtual reality attention training in ADHD.

trial registrationdrks.de (identifier: DRKS00022370).

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityNeurofeedbackVirtual RealityAdultAttentionHumansReaction TimeADHDAdultsAttention trainingContinuous performance taskDistractorsEEGEye-trackingMetacognitionSelf-regulationTherapyTreatmentVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID36703134
PMCPMC9879564
OpenAlexW4318189511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.