Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36703012›Full record

ReviewArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2023

Female genital mutilation/cutting: going beyond urogynecologic complications and obstetric outcomes.

Alessandro Libretti, Gabriele Bianco, Christian Corsini, Valentino Remorgida

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: an urgent call to action.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandro LibrettiDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Maggiore Della Carità, Corso Mazzini, 18, 28100, Novara, Italy. libretti.a@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8478-5471
Gabriele BiancoUniversity of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Christian CorsiniDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9603-1589
Valentino RemorgidaDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Maggiore Della Carità, Corso Mazzini, 18, 28100, Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5043-6676
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewFemale genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C or FGM) are procedures that involve partial or total removal of external female genitalia and other injuries to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons. Over 4 million girls are at risk of FGM annually. Since urogynecologic and obstetric complications of FGM have been extensively described and characterized, the aim of this review is to shift the focus on other aspects like perception of women, awareness of community, and knowledge of health workers. Our purpose is to highlight those aspects and understand how their grasp might help to eradicate this practice. RECENT

findingsSelf-perception of women with FGM changes when they emigrate to western countries; awareness of complications and awareness of their rights are factors that make women reject the practice. Women from rural areas, already circumcised, or without a secondary level education are more likely to have a circumcised daughter. Women with at least a secondary education are more likely to agree with the eradication of the practice. Lack of education and poor wealth index are factors associated with men's support of FGM. Although aware of FGM, healthcare professionals need to be trained on this topic. General practitioners play a central role in addressing patients with FGM to the right path of diagnosis and treatment and psychologists in helping them with psychological sequelae.

conclusionThese findings point out the future area of intervention, stressing the need of higher standard of care and global effort to eradicate this practice.

Indexed as

Circumcision, FemaleEducational StatusFemaleGenitalia, FemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleComplicationsFemale circumcisionFemale genital cuttingFemale genital mutilationFGMFGM/C

Identifiers

PMID36703012
OpenAlexW4318192606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.