ArticleEye (London, England)2023
Preliminary data on a novel smart glasses system for measuring the angle of deviation in strabismus.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative Assessment of Strabismus Using Cloud AI Computing: Validation Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- A Novel Virtual Reality-Based System for Measuring Deviation Angle in Strabismus: A Prospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesTo propose a novel smart glasses device for recording eye movement and compare its results to the prism alternate cover test (PACT). SUBJECTS/
methodsThis method comparison study enrolled patients with strabismic conditions, who first underwent conventional strabismus evaluations (PACT in the primary position), followed by the smart glasses NeuroSpeed system (NSS) recording protocols. The video recordings were analysed using specialized software, to calculate the horizontal deviation from the primary position. The results were compared with those of the PACT using Passing‒Bablok regression and Bland‒Altman analysis.
resultsThis study included 70 individuals aged 4 to 80 years, of which 38 were men and 32 were women. The overall analysis of horizontal deviations using the Passing‒Bablok regression revealed a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.969, with a systemic bias of 0.00, a proportional bias of 0.809, and a perpendicular residual standard deviation of 4.134.
conclusionsThe predictive values of eye movement examinations recorded by the NSS were comparable to those of the PACT. Thus, this new system can provide additional information for ophthalmologists to aid in the diagnosis and measurement of strabismus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.