Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36702906›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2023

Comparison of severity scales for acute bronchiolitis in real clinical practice.

Elena Granda, Mario Urbano, Pilar Andrés, Marina Corchete, Alfredo Cano, Roberto Velasco

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena GrandaPediatrics Department, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain. e_granda15@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8958-0413
Mario UrbanoPediatrics Department, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.
Pilar AndrésPediatrics Department, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.
Marina CorchetePediatrics Department, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.
Alfredo CanoPediatrics Department, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.
Roberto VelascoPediatric Emergency Department, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Río Hortega · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several clinical scales have been developed to assess the severity of bronchiolitis as well as the probability of needing in-hospital care. A recent systematic review of 32 validated clinical scores for bronchiolitis concluded that 6 of them (Wood-Downes, M-WCAS, Respiratory Severity Score, Respiratory Clinical Score, Respiratory Score and Bronchiolitis risk of admission score) were the best ones regarding reliability, sensitivity, validity, and usability. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has compared all of them in a clinical scenario. Also, after this review, three more scales were published: BROSJOD, Tal modified, and one score developed by PERN. Our main aim was to compare the ability of different clinical scales for bronchiolitis to predict any relevant outcome. A prospective observational study was conducted that included patients of up to 12 months old attended to, due to bronchiolitis, in the paediatric Emergency Department of a secondary university hospital from October 2019 to January 2022. For each patient, the attending clinician filled in a form with the items of the scales, decomposed, in order to prevent the clinician from knowing the score of each scale. Then, the patient was managed according to the protocol of our Emergency Department. A phone call was made to each patient in order to check whether the patient ended up being admitted in the next 48 h. In the case of those that were impossible to contact by phone, the clinical history was reviewed. For the purpose of the study, any of the following were considered to be a relevant outcome: admission to ward and need for supplementary oxygen, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or intravenous fluids, and admission to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) within the next 48 h or death. For the aim of the study, the area under the curve (AUC) and the odds ratio (OR) for a relevant outcome were calculated in each scale. Also, the best cut-off point was estimated according to the Youden index, and its sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) for a relevant outcome were calculated. We included 265 patients (52.1% male) with a median age of 5.3 months (P

Indexed as

BronchiolitisNoninvasive VentilationChildFemaleHospitalizationHumansInfantMaleObservational Studies as TopicReproducibility of ResultsRespiration, ArtificialBronchiolitisEmergency DepartmentScale

Identifiers

PMID36702906
OpenAlexW4318193113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.