ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2023
Comparison of severity scales for acute bronchiolitis in real clinical practice.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- "Comparison between high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in children with acute respiratory failure by bronchiolitis: a randomized controlled trial".BMC pediatrics · 2024Trial
- Effects of implementing a clinical scoring system on the management of infants with RSV bronchiolitis.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Observational
- Application of machine learning to predict bronchiolitis severity in children: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Performance of PRISM III and pediatric early warning score for predicting patients needing increased level of care in a pediatric intermediate care unit.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Modified Tal (M-Tal) Score as a Predictor of Outcomes in Infants with Bronchiolitis: A Prospective Study.Pediatric reports · 2026Article
- Implementation of a nursing- and respiratory therapist-led high-flow nasal cannula pathway is associated with decreased ICU length of stay in bronchiolitis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Assessing bronchiolitis severity: a comparative analysis of two commonly used clinical scoring systems.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Observational
- Clinical-Ultrasound Model to Predict the Clinical Course in Bronchiolitis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Characterisation of RSV infections in children without chronic diseases aged 0-36 months during the post-COVID-19 winter season 2022/2023.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several clinical scales have been developed to assess the severity of bronchiolitis as well as the probability of needing in-hospital care. A recent systematic review of 32 validated clinical scores for bronchiolitis concluded that 6 of them (Wood-Downes, M-WCAS, Respiratory Severity Score, Respiratory Clinical Score, Respiratory Score and Bronchiolitis risk of admission score) were the best ones regarding reliability, sensitivity, validity, and usability. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has compared all of them in a clinical scenario. Also, after this review, three more scales were published: BROSJOD, Tal modified, and one score developed by PERN. Our main aim was to compare the ability of different clinical scales for bronchiolitis to predict any relevant outcome. A prospective observational study was conducted that included patients of up to 12 months old attended to, due to bronchiolitis, in the paediatric Emergency Department of a secondary university hospital from October 2019 to January 2022. For each patient, the attending clinician filled in a form with the items of the scales, decomposed, in order to prevent the clinician from knowing the score of each scale. Then, the patient was managed according to the protocol of our Emergency Department. A phone call was made to each patient in order to check whether the patient ended up being admitted in the next 48 h. In the case of those that were impossible to contact by phone, the clinical history was reviewed. For the purpose of the study, any of the following were considered to be a relevant outcome: admission to ward and need for supplementary oxygen, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or intravenous fluids, and admission to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) within the next 48 h or death. For the aim of the study, the area under the curve (AUC) and the odds ratio (OR) for a relevant outcome were calculated in each scale. Also, the best cut-off point was estimated according to the Youden index, and its sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) for a relevant outcome were calculated. We included 265 patients (52.1% male) with a median age of 5.3 months (P
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.