Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36702905›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2023

Pathological consequences of DNA damage in the kidney.

Juan I Garaycoechea, Catherine Quinlan, Martijn S Luijsterburg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. TRIM21 inhibition alleviates acute kidney injury by promoting INTS3-associated DNA damage repair.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cellular senescence in kidney diseases.Chinese medical journal · 2025
    Review
  10. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Juan I GaraycoecheaHubrecht Institute-KNAW, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. juan.g@hubrecht.eu.
Catherine QuinlanDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2746-6903
Martijn S LuijsterburgDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands. m.luijsterburg@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-5796-6541
Leiden University Medical Center · NLRoyal Children's Hospital · AUUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA lesions that evade repair can lead to mutations that drive the development of cancer, and cellular responses to DNA damage can trigger senescence and cell death, which are associated with ageing. In the kidney, DNA damage has been implicated in both acute and chronic kidney injury, and in renal cell carcinoma. The susceptibility of the kidney to chemotherapeutic agents that damage DNA is well established, but an unexpected link between kidney ciliopathies and the DNA damage response has also been reported. In addition, human genetic deficiencies in DNA repair have highlighted DNA crosslinks, DNA breaks and transcription-blocking damage as lesions that are particularly toxic to the kidney. Genetic tools in mice, as well as advances in kidney organoid and single-cell RNA sequencing technologies, have provided important insights into how specific kidney cell types respond to DNA damage. The emerging view is that in the kidney, DNA damage affects the local microenvironment by triggering a damage response and cell proliferation to replenish injured cells, as well as inducing systemic responses aimed at reducing exposure to genotoxic stress. The pathological consequences of DNA damage are therefore key to the nephrotoxicity of DNA-damaging agents and the kidney phenotypes observed in human DNA repair-deficiency disorders.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairAgingAnimalsDNAHumansKidneyMiceDNA

Identifiers

PMID36702905
OpenAlexW4318067884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.