ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2023
Electrochemical ELASA: improving early cancer detection and monitoring.
Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrochemical Biosensors for Circulating Tumor Cells and ctDNA: Emerging Strategies for Precision Oncology.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Electrochemical Biosensors for Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis Using Protein Biomarkers: Current Trends, Advances, and Clinical Translation Potential.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A bibliometric analysis of nucleic acid probe and its applications in oncology: towards more precise molecular medicine.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Breaking barriers in cancer diagnosis: unveiling the 4Ms of biosensors.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Nanozyme-based aptasensors for the detection of tumor biomarkers.Journal of biological engineering · 2025Review
- New Insights into Aptamers: An Alternative to Antibodies in the Detection of Molecular Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The discovery of new molecular biomarkers of cancer during the last decades and the development of new diagnostic devices exploiting those have significantly contributed to the clinical analysis of cancer and to improve the outcomes. Among those, liquid biopsy sensors exploiting aptamers for the detection of cancer biomarkers in body fluids are useful and accurate tools for a fast and inexpensive non-invasive screening of population. The incorporation of aptamers in electrochemical sandwich biosensors using enzyme labels, a so-called ELASA, has demonstrated its utility to improve the detection schemes. In this review, we overview the existing ELASA assays for numerous cancer biomarkers as alternatives to the traditional ELISA and discuss their possibilities to reach the market, currently dominated by optical immunoassays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.