Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36702618›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2023

Results from rapid-cycle recurrent genomic selection in spring bread wheat.

Susanne Dreisigacker, Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez, Leonardo Crespo-Herrera, Alison R Bentley, José Crossa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Integrating genomic predictions into an applied Central European wheat breeding program.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biodiversity and genetic improvement ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  7. Rapid cycling genomic selection in maize landraces: a step toward closing the yield gap.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Rapid cycling genomic selection in maize landraces.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genetic gains in IRRI's rice salinity breeding and elite panel development as a future breeding resource.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susanne DreisigackerInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45 Carretera México-Veracruz, Texcoco, Edo. de México, CP 56100, México.ORCID 0000-0002-3546-5989
Paulino Pérez-RodríguezColegio de Postgraduados, Montecillos, Edo. de México, CP 56264, México.ORCID 0000-0002-3202-1784
Leonardo Crespo-HerreraInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45 Carretera México-Veracruz, Texcoco, Edo. de México, CP 56100, México.ORCID 0000-0003-0506-4700
Alison R BentleyInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45 Carretera México-Veracruz, Texcoco, Edo. de México, CP 56100, México.ORCID 0000-0001-5519-4357
José CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45 Carretera México-Veracruz, Texcoco, Edo. de México, CP 56100, México.ORCID 0000-0001-9429-5855

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) in wheat breeding programs is of great interest for predicting the genotypic values of individuals, where both additive and nonadditive effects determine the final breeding value of lines. While several simulation studies have shown the efficiency of rapid-cycling GS strategies for parental selection or population improvement, their practical implementations are still lacking in wheat and other crops. In this study, we demonstrate the potential of rapid-cycle recurrent GS (RCRGS) to increase genetic gain for grain yield (GY) in wheat. Our results showed a consistent realized genetic gain for GY after 3 cycles of recombination (C1, C2, and C3) of bi-parental F1s, when summarized across 2 years of phenotyping. For both evaluation years combined, genetic gain through RCRGS reached 12.3% from cycle C0 to C3 and realized gain was 0.28 ton ha-1 per cycle with a GY from C0 (6.88 ton ha-1) to C3 (7.73 ton ha-1). RCRGS was also associated with some changes in important agronomic traits that were measured (days to heading, days to maturity, and plant height) but not selected for. To account for these changes, we recommend implementing GS together with multi-trait prediction models.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticTriticumBreadEdible GrainGenome, PlantGenomicsGenotypeHumansModels, GeneticPhenotypePlant Breedinggenomic-assisted breedinggenomic predictionGenPredmolecular markerspedigree informationrapid-cycle recurrent genomic selectionshared data resourceswheat

Identifiers

PMID36702618
PMCPMC10085763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.