Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36702614›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2023

New perforated radiation shield for anesthesiologists: Monte Carlo simulation of effects.

Ayaka Yanagawa, Takeshi Takata, Taichi Onimaru, Takahiro Honjo, Takeyuki Sajima, Akihito Kakinuma, Akihisa Kataoka, Jun'ichi Kotoku

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ayaka YanagawaDepartment of Anesthesia, Teikyo University, Tokyo 173-8605, Japan.
Takeshi TakataAdvanced Comprehensive Research Organization, Teikyo University, Tokyo 173-8605, Japan.
Taichi OnimaruDepartment of Anesthesia, Teikyo University, Tokyo 173-8605, Japan.
Takahiro HonjoDepartment of Anesthesia, Teikyo University, Tokyo 173-8605, Japan.
Takeyuki SajimaDepartment of Anesthesia, Teikyo University, Tokyo 173-8605, Japan.
Akihito KakinumaDepartment of Anesthesia, Teikyo University, Tokyo 173-8605, Japan.
Akihisa KataokaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Teikyo University, Tokyo 173-8605, Japan.
Jun'ichi KotokuGraduate School of Medical Care and Technology, Teikyo University, Tokyo 173-8605, Japan.
Teikyo University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21K07656JST ERATO JPMJER2102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catheterization for structural heart disease (SHD) requires fluoroscopic guidance, which exposes health care professionals to radiation exposure risk. Nevertheless, existing freestanding radiation shields for anesthesiologists are typically simple, uncomfortable rectangles. Therefore, we devised a new perforated radiation shield that allows anesthesiologists and echocardiographers to access a patient through its apertures during SHD catheterization. No report of the relevant literature has described the degree to which the anesthesiologist's radiation dose can be reduced by installing radiation shields. For estimating whole-body doses to anesthesiologists and air dose distributions in the operating room, we used a Monte Carlo system for a rapid dose-estimation system used with interventional radiology. The simulations were performed under four conditions: no radiation shield, large apertures, small apertures and without apertures. With small apertures, the doses to the lens, waist and neck surfaces were found to be comparable to those of a protective plate without an aperture, indicating that our new radiation shield copes with radiation protection and work efficiency. To simulate the air-absorbed dose distribution, results indicated that a fan-shaped area of the dose rate decrease was generated in the area behind the shield, as seen from the tube sphere. For the aperture, radiation was found to wrap around the backside of the shield, even at a height that did not match the aperture height. The data presented herein are expected to be of interest to all anesthesiologists who might be involved in SHD catheterization. The data are also expected to enhance their understanding of radiation exposure protection.

Indexed as

Radiation ExposureRadiation ProtectionAnesthesiologistsHumansMonte Carlo MethodPhantoms, ImagingRadiation Dosageanesthesiologistprotectionradiationshieldsimulationstructural heart disease (SHD)

Identifiers

PMID36702614
PMCPMC10036102
OpenAlexW4318224861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read8
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.