Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36702495›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2023

Direct brain recordings suggest a causal subsequent-memory effect.

Daniel Y Rubinstein, Christoph T Weidemann, Michael R Sperling, Michael J Kahana

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Time-Resolved Aperiodic and Oscillatory Dynamics during Human Visual Memory Encoding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. The Penn Electrophysiology of Encoding and Retrieval Study.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel Y RubinsteinDepartment of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Christoph T WeidemannDepartment of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.
Michael R SperlingDepartment of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Michael J KahanaDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Thomas Jefferson University · USColumbia University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Using Direct Brain Stimulation to Study Cognitive ElectrophysiologyU01NS113198 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KAHANA, MICHAEL JACOB · 2019 to 2023
$6.9M
Targeted closed-loop intracranial brain-stimulation to improve episodic memoryR01NS106611 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KAHANA, MICHAEL JACOB · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS106611NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS113198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endogenous variation in brain state and stimulus-specific evoked activity can both contribute to successful encoding. Previous studies, however, have not clearly distinguished among these components. We address this question by analysing intracranial EEG recorded from epilepsy patients as they studied and subsequently recalled lists of words. We first trained classifiers to predict recall of either single items or entire lists and found that both classifiers exhibited similar performance. We found that list-level classifier output-a biomarker of successful encoding-tracked item presentation and recall events, despite having no information about the trial structure. Across widespread brain regions, decreased low- and increased high-frequency activity (HFA) marked successful encoding of both items and lists. We found regional differences in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, where in the hippocampus HFA correlated more strongly with item recall, whereas, in the prefrontal cortex, HFA correlated more strongly with list performance. Despite subtle differences in item- and list-level features, the similarity in overall classification performance, spectral signatures of successful recall and fluctuations of spectral activity across the encoding period argue for a shared endogenous process that causally impacts the brain's ability to learn new information.

Indexed as

BrainMental RecallBrain MappingElectrocorticographyHippocampusHumansPrefrontal Cortexepisodic memoryfree recallintracranial EEGneural decodingsubsequent memory effect

Identifiers

PMID36702495
PMCPMC10233277
OpenAlexW4318174440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.