ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2023
Predicted probabilities of live birth following assisted reproductive technology using United States national surveillance data from 2016 to 2018.
Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Community awareness of assisted reproductive technologies in Jordan: educational gaps and knowledge levels.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Unravelling sex-specific differences in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a multiorgan perspective.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- After the Shock: Impact of Ectopic Pregnancy on Subsequent Fertility and Parenthood.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Article
- Effects of maternal poor ovarian response on the reproductive endocrine profiles of the next generation: a prospective cohort study in China.Human reproduction open · 2025Article
- Cumulative live birth rates following assisted reproduction: the younger, the better? A response.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2024Article
- Perinatal complications and neonatal outcomes inFrontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived ovarian support cell co-culture improves oocyte maturation in vitro after abbreviated gonadotropin stimulation.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Hysteroscopic Identification of Intrauterine Pathology in Oocyte Donation Cycles: A Retrospective Study.Cureus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs the use of in vitro fertilization continues to increase in the United States, up-to-date models that estimate cumulative live birth rates after multiple oocyte retrievals and embryo transfers (fresh and frozen) are valuable for patients and clinicians weighing treatment options.
objectiveThis study aimed to develop models that generate predicted probabilities of live birth in individuals considering in vitro fertilization based on demographic and reproductive characteristics. STUDY
designOur population-based cohort study used data from the National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System 2016 to 2018, including 196,916 women who underwent 207,766 autologous embryo transfer cycles and 25,831 women who underwent 36,909 donor oocyte transfer cycles. We used data on autologous in vitro fertilization cycles to develop models that estimate a patient's cumulative live birth rate after all embryo transfers (fresh and frozen) within 12 months after 1, 2, and 3 oocyte retrievals in new and returning patients. Among patients using donor oocytes, we estimated the cumulative live birth rate after their first, second, and third embryo transfers. Multinomial logistic regression models adjusted for age, prepregnancy body mass index (imputed for 18% of missing values), parity, gravidity, and infertility diagnoses were used to estimate the cumulative live birth rate.
resultsAmong new and returning patients undergoing autologous in vitro fertilization, female age had the strongest association with cumulative live birth rate. Other factors associated with higher cumulative live birth rates were lower body mass index and parity or gravidity ≥1, although results were inconsistent. Infertility diagnoses of diminished ovarian reserve, uterine factor, and other reasons were associated with a lower cumulative live birth rate, whereas male factor, tubal factor, ovulatory disorders, and unexplained infertility were associated with a higher cumulative live birth rate. Based on our models, a new patient who is 35 years old, with a body mass index of 25 kg/m
conclusionOur models provided estimates of cumulative live birth rate based on demographic and reproductive characteristics to help inform patients and providers of a woman's probability of success after in vitro fertilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.