Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36701618›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2023

Trends in Attempted and Successful Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery in the United States From 2010 to 2020.

Ann M Bruno, Amanda A Allshouse, Torri D Metz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07006896 (Labor Induction After Cesarean), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07006896 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Labor Induction After Cesarean: A Randomized Trial Of Cervical Balloon With or Without Oxytocin

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2025 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsLabor Induction, Cesarean DeliveryArmsFoley balloon, Oxytocin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. FIGO good practice recommendations for vaginal birth after cesarean section.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Success rate and obstetric outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean delivery-Decision-tree analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Fostering Excellence in Obstetrical Surgery.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ann M BrunoUniversity of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, and Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, Utah.
Amanda A Allshouse
Torri D Metz
Intermountain Healthcare · US

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) delivery rate was last reported as 13.8% in 2019. However, contemporary trends in attempted and successful trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) delivery among individuals with prior cesarean delivery have not been evaluated. We performed a repeated cross-sectional analysis of singleton, cephalic, term deliveries in individuals with a history of one or two cesarean deliveries in the National Vital Statistics System from 2010 to 2020. Temporal trends in attempted and successful TOLAC, as well as VBAC, were characterized using joinpoint regression. Overall, 4,277,800 deliveries were included. Attempted TOLAC increased from 15.3% in 2010 to 21.7% in 2020, with an annual percent increase (relative) of 4.25% (95% CI 2.9-5.6%). Successful TOLAC increased from 69.8% to 74.7%, with an annual percent change (relative) of 0.91% (95% CI 0.7-1.2%). The VBAC rate similarly increased such that, by 2020, it was 16.2%.

Indexed as

Trial of LaborVaginal Birth after CesareanCesarean SectionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36701618
PMCPMC10477004
OpenAlexW4311898469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.