Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36701591›Full record

ReviewDiabetes care2023

The National Clinical Care Commission Report to Congress: Summary and Next Steps.

Paul R Conlin, John M Boltri, Ann Bullock, M Carol Greenlee, Aaron M Lopata, Clydette Powell, Dean Schillinger, Howard Tracer, William H Herman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Optimal Management of Insulin in Patients Undergoing 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Scans.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paul R ConlinDepartment of Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-5720-0466
John M BoltriNortheast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH.
Ann BullockDivision of Diabetes Treatment and Prevention, Indian Health Service, Rockville, MD.
M Carol GreenleeWestern Slope Endocrinology, Grand Junction, CO.
Aaron M LopataMaternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, MD.
Clydette PowellSchool of Medicine and Health Services, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Dean SchillingerUniversity of California San Francisco and San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA.
Howard TracerAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD.
William H HermanUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-0502-674X

Funding

Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mehboob A Hussain · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U18 DP006526NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The U.S. is experiencing an epidemic of type 2 diabetes. Socioeconomically disadvantaged and certain racial and ethnic groups experience a disproportionate burden from diabetes and are subject to disparities in treatment and outcomes. The National Clinical Care Commission (NCCC) was charged with making recommendations to leverage federal policies and programs to more effectively prevent and control diabetes and its complications. The NCCC determined that diabetes cannot be addressed simply as a medical problem but must also be addressed as a societal problem requiring social, clinical, and public health policy solutions. As a result, the NCCC's recommendations address policies and programs of both non-health-related and health-related federal agencies. The NCCC report, submitted to the U.S. Congress on 6 January 2022, makes 39 specific recommendations, including three foundational recommendations that non-health-related and health-related federal agencies coordinate their activities to better address diabetes, that all federal agencies and departments ensure that health equity is a guiding principle for their policies and programs that impact diabetes, and that all Americans have access to comprehensive and affordable health care. Specific recommendations are also made to improve general population-wide policies and programs that impact diabetes risk and control, to increase awareness and prevention efforts among those at high risk for type 2 diabetes, and to remove barriers to access to effective treatments for diabetes and its complications. Finally, the NCCC recommends that an Office of National Diabetes Policy be established to coordinate the activities of health-related and non-health-related federal agencies to address diabetes prevention and treatment. The NCCC urges Congress and the Secretary of Health and Human Services to implement these recommendations to protect the health and well-being of the more than 130 million Americans at risk for and living with diabetes.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Health EquityHealth PolicyHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36701591
PMCPMC9887605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.