Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36701357›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Awareness and perceptions of Long COVID among people in the REACT programme: Early insights from a pilot interview study.

Emily Cooper, Adam Lound, Christina J Atchison, Matthew Whitaker, Caroline Eccles, Graham S Cooke, Paul Elliott, Helen Ward

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Post-COVID-19 conditions: a systematic review on advanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging findings.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Toward characterizing brain fog in long COVID: correlates and impact on measurement metrics.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Challenges of Inclusion: A Population-Based Interview Study of Long Covid.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Barriers to healthcare access and experiences of stigma: Findings from a coproduced Long Covid case-finding study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An intersectional analysis of long COVID prevalence.International journal for equity in health · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emily CooperPatient Experience Research Centre, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1834-1036
Adam LoundPatient Experience Research Centre, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Christina J AtchisonPatient Experience Research Centre, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Matthew WhitakerSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Caroline EcclesREACT-Long Covid Public Advisory Group, Patient Experience Research Centre, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Graham S CookeDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul ElliottSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Helen WardPatient Experience Research Centre, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Imperial College London · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBMRC Centre for Environment and Health

Funding

British Heart Foundation RE/18/4/34215Department of Health COV-LT-0040Medical Research Council MC_PC_20049Medical Research Council MR/L01341X/1Medical Research Council MR/S019669/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong COVID is a patient-made term describing new or persistent symptoms experienced following SARS-CoV-2 infection. The Real-time Assessment of Community Transmission-Long COVID (REACT-LC) study aims to understand variation in experiences following infection, and to identify biological, social, and environmental factors associated with Long COVID. We undertook a pilot interview study to inform the design, recruitment approach, and topic guide for the REACT-LC qualitative study. We sought to gain initial insights into the experience and attribution of new or persistent symptoms and the awareness or perceived applicability of the term Long COVID.

methodsPeople were invited to REACT-LC assessment centres if they had taken part in REACT, a random community-based prevalence study, and had a documented history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We invited people from REACT-LC assessment centres who had reported experiencing persistent symptoms for more than 12 weeks to take part in an interview. We conducted face to face and online semi-structured interviews which were transcribed and analysed using Thematic Analysis.

resultsWe interviewed 13 participants (6 female, 7 male, median age 31). Participants reported a wide variation in both new and persistent symptoms which were often fluctuating or unpredictable in nature. Some participants were confident about the link between their persistent symptoms and COVID-19; however, others were unclear about the underlying cause of symptoms or felt that the impact of public health measures (such as lockdowns) played a role. We found differences in awareness and perceived applicability of the term Long COVID.

conclusionThis pilot has informed the design, recruitment approach and topic guide for our qualitative study. It offers preliminary insights into the varied experiences of people living with persistent symptoms including differences in symptom attribution and perceived applicability of the term Long COVID. This variation shows the value of recruiting from a nationally representative sample of participants who are experiencing persistent symptoms.

Indexed as

COVID-19Post-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeAdultCommunicable Disease ControlFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36701357
PMCPMC9879384
OpenAlexW4318142514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.