Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36701285›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Effect of field strength on RF power deposition near conductive leads: A simulation study of SAR in DBS lead models during MRI at 1.5 T-10.5 T.

Ehsan Kazemivalipour, Alireza Sadeghi-Tarakameh, Boris Keil, Yigitcan Eryaman, Ergin Atalar, Laleh Golestanirad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Control of radiated emissions during MRI using parallel transmit: a path to eliminating the Faraday shielded room for 0.5T imaging.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dual birdcage coils to control radiation from MRI systems operated without a Faraday cage.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Low-field MRI's Spark on Implant Safety: A Closer Look at Radiofrequency Heating.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2023
    Article
  15. Rapid prediction of MRI-induced RF heating of active implantable medical devices using machine learning.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2023
    Article
  16. RF-induced heating of capped and uncapped abandoned epicardial leads during MRI at 1.5 T and 3 T.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ehsan KazemivalipourDepartment of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4221-2397
Alireza Sadeghi-TarakamehCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5718-6553
Boris KeilInstitute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, TH Mittelhessen University of Applied Sciences, Giessen, Germany.
Yigitcan EryamanCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Ergin AtalarElectrical and Electronics Engineering Department, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
Laleh GolestaniradDepartment of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3869-6114

Funding

TRD4 - Ultrahigh Field Engineering and SafetyP41EB027061 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Gregory John Metzger, KAMIL UGURBIL · 2019 to 2026
$11.7M
Elementary Neuronal Ensembles to Whole Brain Networks: Ultrahigh Resolution Imaging of Function and Connectivity in Humans - SUPPLEMENTU01EB025144 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL · 2017 to 2022
$9.7M
Reconfigurable MRI technology for safe and high-resolution imaging of deep brain stimulation at 3TR01EB030324 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GOLESTANI RAD, LALEH · 2021 to 2024
$2.1M
Safe Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation SystemsR01NS115180 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ERYAMAN, YIGITCAN · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB030324NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB025144NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS115180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) nearly four decades ago, there has been a quest for ever-higher magnetic field strengths. Strong incentives exist to do so, as increasing the magnetic field strength increases the signal-to-noise ratio of images. However, ensuring patient safety becomes more challenging at high and ultrahigh field MRI (i.e., ≥3 T) compared to lower fields. The problem is exacerbated for patients with conductive implants, such as those with deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices, as excessive local heating can occur around implanted lead tips. Despite extensive effort to assess radio frequency (RF) heating of implants during MRI at 1.5 T, a comparative study that systematically examines the effects of field strength and various exposure limits on RF heating is missing. PURPOSE: This study aims to perform numerical simulations that systematically compare RF power deposition near DBS lead models during MRI at common clinical and ultra-high field strengths, namely 1.5, 3, 7, and 10.5 T. Furthermore, we assess the effects of different exposure constraints on RF power deposition by imposing limits on either the B1+ or global head specific absorption rate (SAR) as these two exposure limits commonly appear in MRI guidelines.

methodsWe created 33 unique DBS lead models based on postoperative computed tomography (CT) images of patients with implanted DBS devices and performed electromagnetic simulations to evaluate the SAR of RF energy in the tissue surrounding lead tips during RF exposure at frequencies ranging from 64 MHz (1.5 T) to 447 MHz (10.5 T). The RF exposure was implemented via realistic MRI RF coil models created based on physical prototypes built in our institutions. We systematically examined the distribution of local SAR at different frequencies with the input coil power adjusted to either limit the B1+ or the global head SAR.

resultsThe MRI RF coils at higher resonant frequencies generated lower SARs around the lead tips when the global head SAR was constrained. The trend was reversed when the constraint was imposed on B1+.

conclusionAt higher static fields, MRI is not necessarily more dangerous than at lower fields for patients with conductive leads. Specifically, when a conservative safety criterion, such as constraints on the global SAR, is imposed, coils at a higher resonant frequency tend to generate a lower local SAR around implanted leads due to the decreased B1+ and, by proxy, E field levels.

Indexed as

Hot TemperatureMagnetic Resonance ImagingComputer SimulationElectric ConductivityHumansPhantoms, ImagingProstheses and ImplantsRadio Waves

Identifiers

PMID36701285
PMCPMC9879463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.