Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36701184›Full record

Observational studyJMIR public health and surveillance2023

Association Between Purchase of Over-the-Counter Medications and Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis in the Cancer Loyalty Card Study (CLOCS): Observational Case-Control Study.

Hannah R Brewer, Yasemin Hirst, Marc Chadeau-Hyam, Eric Johnson, Sudha Sundar, James M Flanagan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03994653 (Cancer Loyalty Card Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03994653 completednot on this map

Cancer Loyalty Card Study: a Retrospective Observational Case-Control Study

TypeobservationalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2019 to 2022Enrolled963ConditionsOvarian NeoplasmsArmsRisk Factor Questionnaire, Clinical Questionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Prediagnostic prescription patterns in pancreatic cancer: a retrospective primary care cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hannah R Brewer *Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5495-8597
Yasemin HirstDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0167-9428
Marc Chadeau-HyamSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8341-5436
Eric JohnsonSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6133-8206
Sudha SundarInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5843-3015
James M FlanaganDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4955-1383

Funding

Cancer Research UK 26726Cancer Research UK C38463/A26726Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver-the-counter (OTC) medications are frequently used to self-care for nonspecific ovarian cancer symptoms prior to diagnosis. Monitoring such purchases may provide an opportunity for earlier diagnosis.

objectiveThe aim of the Cancer Loyalty Card Study (CLOCS) was to investigate purchases of OTC pain and indigestion medications prior to ovarian cancer diagnosis in women with and without ovarian cancer in the United Kingdom using loyalty card data.

methodsAn observational case-control study was performed comparing purchases of OTC pain and indigestion medications prior to diagnosis in women with (n=153) and without (n=120) ovarian cancer using loyalty card data from two UK-based high street retailers. Monthly purchases of pain and indigestion medications for cases and controls were compared using the Fisher exact test, conditional logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

resultsPain and indigestion medication purchases were increased among cases 8 months before diagnosis, with maximum discrimination between cases and controls 8 months before diagnosis (Fisher exact odds ratio [OR] 2.9, 95% CI 2.1-4.1). An increase in indigestion medication purchases was detected up to 9 months before diagnosis (adjusted conditional logistic regression OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.04-1.83). The ROC analysis for indigestion medication purchases showed a maximum area under the curve (AUC) at 13 months before diagnosis (AUC=0.65, 95% CI 0.57-0.73), which further improved when stratified to late-stage ovarian cancer (AUC=0.68, 95% CI 0.59-0.78).

conclusionsThere is a difference in purchases of pain and indigestion medications among women with and without ovarian cancer up to 8 months before diagnosis. Facilitating earlier presentation among those who self-care for symptoms using this novel data source could improve ovarian cancer patients' options for treatment and improve survival.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03994653; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03994653.

Indexed as

DyspepsiaOvarian NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansPaincancer riskearly diagnosishealth informaticsindigestion medicationmedicationnonspecific symptomsovarian cancerover-the-counter medicationpain medicationself-careself-medicationtransactional data

Identifiers

PMID36701184
PMCPMC9912145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.