ArticleJAMA oncology2023
Association Between Age and Survival Trends in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Adoption of Immunotherapy.
Article in JAMA oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Heterogeneity between subgroups of first-line chemoimmunotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Long-Term Outcomes of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With S-1 in Older Patients With Esophageal Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Efficacy, safety and exploratory analysis of neoadjuvant tislelizumab (a PD-1 inhibitor) plus nab-paclitaxel followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide for triple-negative breast cancer: a phase 2 TREND trial.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Trial
- Effectiveness and safety of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC with pericardial effusions: a global retrospective multicenter study.The oncologist · 2026Observational
- Health care use and costs associated with clinically impactful immune-related adverse events during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- Real-world effectiveness of pembrolizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a decade of evidence and experience.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Review
- Technical review of artificial intelligence in TCR-T therapy.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026Review
- Utility of RB1 immunohistochemistry for prognostic subtyping of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Immune-related adverse events between elderly patients with gastrointestinal and lung cancers: A real-world study.Chinese medical journal · 2026Article
- Aging modulation of the immune system and immunotherapy efficacy in cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Safety and efficacy of PRaG therapy in elderly cancer patients.Immunotherapy advances · 2026Article
- Review
- Ageing, immune fitness and cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025Review
- A New Era, New Risks: The Cardio-Oncology Perspective on Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Too much or too little? The trajectory of systemic anti-cancer treatment throughout the last year of life of lung cancer patients in Norway.BJC reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Older Adult Participation in Early-Phase Lung Cancer Clinical Trials, 1998 to 2020.JTO clinical and research reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has transformed the care of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although clinical trials suggest substantial survival benefits, it is unclear how outcomes have changed in clinical practice. Objective: To assess temporal trends in ICI use and survival among patients with advanced NSCLC across age strata. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was performed in approximately 280 predominantly community-based US cancer clinics and included patients aged 18 years or older who had stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV NSCLC diagnosed between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019, with follow-up through December 31, 2020. Data were analyzed April 1, 2021, to October 19, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Median overall survival and 2-year survival probability. The predicted probability of 2-year survival was calculated using a mixed-effects logit model adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. Results: The study sample included 53 719 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.5 [9.3] years; 28 374 men [52.8%]), the majority of whom were White individuals (36 316 [67.6%]). The overall receipt of cancer-directed therapy increased from 69.0% in 2011 to 77.2% in 2019. After the first US Food and Drug Administration approval of an ICI for NSCLC, the use of ICIs increased from 4.7% in 2015 to 45.6% in 2019 (P < .001). Use of ICIs in 2019 was similar between the youngest and oldest patients (aged <55 years, 45.2% vs aged ≥75 years, 43.8%; P = .59). From 2011 to 2018, the predicted probability of 2-year survival increased from 37.7% to 50.3% among patients younger than 55 years and from 30.6% to 36.2% in patients 75 years or older (P < .001). Similarly, median survival in patients younger than 55 years increased from 11.5 months to 16.0 months during the study period, while survival among patients 75 years or older increased from 9.1 months in 2011 to 10.2 months in 2019. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that, among patients with advanced NSCLC, the uptake of ICIs after US Food and Drug Administration approval was rapid across all age groups. However, corresponding survival gains were modest, particularly in the oldest patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.