ArticleSurgical case reports2023
The usefulness of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal endometriosis.
Article in Surgical case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInguinal endometriosis is a rare clinical disease with an unclear etiology and pathogenesis, and its diagnosis requires accurate medical history-taking and histological examination. However, surgical treatment for the condition has not yet been standardized. This report presents two cases of inguinal endometriosis. CASE PRESENTATION: The first patient was a 36-year-old woman who complained of pain and swelling in her right inguinal region. Physical examination revealed a soft, tender right inguinal mass. The size of the mass repeatedly increased and decreased during menstruation and did not show swelling with abdominal pressure. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a 3.5 × 2.5 cm mass with high intensity on T2-weighted imaging in the right inguinal canal, and no communication was found between the lesion site and the abdominal cavity. We diagnosed this case as inguinal endometriosis and managed it using an anterior approach and laparoscopic observation. The second patient was a 51-year-old woman who presented with an intermittently painful mass in her right inguinal region. The mass tended to increase in size, with worsening pain before menstruation. Abdominal computed tomography revealed a 2 × 2 cm cystic mass in the right inguinal region. We made a diagnosis of inguinal ectopic endometriosis and decided to operate via the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) method for excision plus transabdominal observation. The postoperative course in both cases was uneventful with no recurrence.
conclusionsInguinal endometriosis is a rare entity that should be suspected in patients with cyclical symptoms of inguinal pain and swelling that correlate with their menstrual cycle, which might otherwise be attributed to inguinal hernia. It is crucial to make a preoperative diagnosis based on a careful medical review, physical examination, and imaging studies, and to make an appropriate surgical plan. Particularly, in the case of ectopic inguinal endometriosis involving the canal of Nuck, laparoscopic observation is useful for the intraoperative diagnosis of inguinal endometriosis to help rule out the involvement of other abdominal sites. However, it is important to select and modify the surgical technique to avoid rupturing the endometrisis mass and prevent postoperative recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.