Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36701013›Full record

ReviewMedical & biological engineering & computing2023

Artificial intelligence and machine learning as a viable solution for hip implant failure diagnosis-Review of literature and in vitro case study.

Remya Ampadi Ramachandran, Sheng-Wei Chi, P Srinivasa Pai, Kharma Foucher, Didem Ozevin, Mathew T Mathew

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Remya Ampadi RamachandranDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. rampad2@uic.edu.
Sheng-Wei ChiDepartment of Civil, Materials, and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
P Srinivasa PaiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, NMAM IT, Nitte, Karnataka, India.
Kharma FoucherDepartment of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Didem OzevinDepartment of Civil, Materials, and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mathew T MathewDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago, Rockford campus · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The digital health industry is experiencing fast-paced research which can provide digital care programs and technologies to enhance the competence of healthcare delivery. Orthopedic literature also confirms the applicability of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models to medical diagnosis and clinical decision-making. However, implant monitoring after primary surgery often happens with a wellness visit or when a patient complains about it. Neglecting implant design and other technical errors in this scenario, unmonitored circumstances, and lack of post-surgery monitoring may ultimately lead to the implant system's failure and leave us with the only option of high-risk revision surgery. Preventive maintenance seems to be a good choice to identify the onset of an irreversible prosthesis failure. Considering all these aspects for hip implant monitoring, this paper explores existing studies linking ML models and intelligent systems for hip implant diagnosis. This paper explores the feasibility of an alternative continuous monitoring technique for post-surgery implant monitoring backed by an in vitro ML case study. Tribocorrosion and acoustic emission (AE) data are considered based on their efficacy in determining irreversible alteration of implant material to prevent total failures. This study also facilitates the relevance of developing an artificially intelligent implant monitoring methodology that can function with daily patient activities and how it can influence the digital orthopedic diagnosis. AI-based non-invasive hip implant monitoring system enabling point-of-care testing.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHip ProsthesisHumansMachine LearningProsthesis FailureAcoustic emission (AE)Artificial intelligence (AI)Machine learning (ML)Random forest (RF)Tribocorrosion

Identifiers

PMID36701013
OpenAlexW4318046862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.