Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36700955›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Pediatric whole-body magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of STIR and T2 Dixon sequences in the detection and grading of high signal bone marrow changes.

P Zadig, E von Brandis, L S Ording Müller, L Tanturri de Horatio, K Rosendahl, D F M Avenarius

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

P ZadigDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of North-Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
E von BrandisDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
L S Ording MüllerDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
L Tanturri de HoratioDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of North-Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
K RosendahlDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of North-Norway, Tromsø, Norway. karen.rosendahl@unn.no.
D F M AvenariusDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of North-Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NOBambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NO

Funding

Helse Nord RHF 1572-21Helse Sør-Øst RHF 2018033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare short time inversion recovery (STIR) and T2 Dixon in the detection and grading of high signal intensity areas in bone marrow on whole-body MRI in healthy children.

methodsProspective study, including whole-body 1.5-T MRIs from 77 healthy children. Two experienced radiologists in consensus identified and graded areas of high bone marrow signal on STIR and T2-weighted (T2W) turbo spin echo (TSE) Dixon images (presence, extension) in two different sessions at an interval of at least 3 weeks. In a third session, a third observer joined the two readers for an additional consensus reading with all sequences available (substitute gold standard).

resultsFour hundred ninety of 545 (89.9%) high signal areas were visible on both sequences, while 27 (5.0%) were visible on STIR only and 28 (5.1%) on T2W Dixon only. Twenty-four of 27 (89%) lesions seen on STIR only, and 25/28 (89%) seen on T2W Dixon only, were graded as mildly increased signal intensity. The proportion of true positive high signal lesions was higher for the T2W Dixon images as compared to STIR (74.2% vs. 68.2%) (p = 0.029), while the proportion of false negatives was lower (25.9% vs. 31.7% (p = 0.035) for T2W Dixon and STIR, respectively). There was a moderate agreement between the T2W Dixon and STIR-based extension scores on a 0-4 scale, with a kappa of 0.45 (95% CI = 0.34-0.56).

conclusionsMost high signal bone marrow changes identified on a 1.5-T whole-body MRI were seen on both STIR and water-only T2W Dixon, underscoring the importance of using identical protocols when following bone-marrow signal changes over time. KEY POINTS: • Whole-body MRI is increasingly being used to diagnose and monitor diseases in children, such as chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis, malignant/metastatic disease, and histiocytosis. • Standardized and validated imaging protocols, as well as reference standards by age for the growing skeleton are lacking. • Prospective single-center study showed that 90% of high signal bone marrow areas identified on a 1.5-T whole-body MRI in healthy children is seen on both STIR and water-only T2W Dixon, while 5% is seen on STIR only and 5% on T2W Dixon only.

Indexed as

Bone MarrowMagnetic Resonance ImagingChildHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyProspective StudiesWhole Body ImagingBone marrowImaging sequencesMR imagingPediatricsWhole-body imaging

Identifiers

PMID36700955
PMCPMC10290001
OpenAlexW4318169105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.