Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36700302›Full record

ArticleGut and liver2023

Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images: Development, Validation and Comparison with Endosonographers.

Yi Lu, Jiachuan Wu, Minhui Hu, Qinghua Zhong, Limian Er, Huihui Shi, Weihui Cheng, Ke Chen, Yuan Liu, Bingfeng Qiu and 8 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut and liver, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Natural History of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions Measuring 1 to 2 cm.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Applications of artificial intelligence in gastroscopy: a narrative review.The Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Yi LuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3979-5421
Jiachuan WuDigestive Endoscopy Center, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8490-2965
Minhui HuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9909-7356
Qinghua ZhongDepartment of Endoscopic Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6199-5599
Limian ErDepartment of Endoscopy, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7709-316X
Huihui ShiDepartment of Endoscopy, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5500-6467
Weihui ChengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yangjiang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yangjiang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7411-3815
Ke ChenDepartment of Endoscopy, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7680-381X
Yuan LiuDepartment of Endoscopy, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3572-1380
Bingfeng QiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zhoushan Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Zhoushan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8255-619X
Qiancheng XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zhoushan Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Zhoushan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4435-9261
Guangshun LaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Lianjiang People's Hospital, Lianjiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0855-0627
Yufeng WangTianjin Economic-Technological Development Area (TEDA) Yujin Digestive Health Industry Research Institute, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9080-7040
Yuxuan LuoTianjin Economic-Technological Development Area (TEDA) Yujin Digestive Health Industry Research Institute, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4505-4972
Jinbao MuTianjin Economic-Technological Development Area (TEDA) Yujin Digestive Health Industry Research Institute, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9172-2804
Wenjie ZhangTianjin Center for Medical Devices Evaluation and Inspection, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7757-9546
Min ZhiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8178-5572
Jiachen SunDepartment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3646-1039
Sun Yat-sen University · CNTianjin Economic-Technological Development Area · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNHebei Medical University · CNZhoushan Hospital · CNGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CNQujiang People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: The accuracy of endosonographers in diagnosing gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is influenced by experience and subjectivity. Artificial intelligence (AI) has achieved remarkable development in this field. This study aimed to develop an AI-based EUS diagnostic model for the diagnosis of SELs, and evaluated its efficacy with external validation. Methods: We developed the EUS-AI model with ResNeSt50 using EUS images from two hospitals to predict the histopathology of the gastric SELs originating from muscularis propria. The diagnostic performance of the model was also validated using EUS images obtained from four other hospitals. Results: A total of 2,057 images from 367 patients (375 SELs) were chosen to build the models, and 914 images from 106 patients (108 SELs) were chosen for external validation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the model for differentiating gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and non-GISTs in the external validation sets by images were 82.01%, 68.22%, 86.77%, 59.86%, and 78.12%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy in the external validation set by tumors were 83.75%, 71.43%, 89.33%, 60.61%, and 80.56%, respectively. The EUS-AI model showed better performance (especially specificity) than some endosonographers. The model helped improve the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of certain endosonographers. Conclusions: We developed an EUS-AI model to classify gastric SELs originating from muscularis propria into GISTs and non-GISTs with good accuracy. The model may help improve the diagnostic performance of endosonographers. Further work is required to develop a multi-modal EUS-AI system.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsStomach NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceEndosonographyHumansPredictive Value of TestsArtificial intelligenceEndoscopic ultrasonographyGastricGastrointestinal stromal tumorsSubepithelial lesions

Identifiers

PMID36700302
PMCPMC10651383
OpenAlexW4318065699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.