ArticleJoint diseases and related surgery2023
Analysis of prognostic factors and histopathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma.
Article in Joint diseases and related surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgical resection in osteosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio predicts survival in localized osteosarcoma in Vietnamese patients.iScience · 2026Article
- Pathologic fracture following neoadjuvant therapy: a paradoxical radiological sign of effective treatment response.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Circular RNAs in osteosarcoma: mechanistic insights, autophagy regulation, and potential therapeutic strategies.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by limb-sparing surgery for osteosarcoma: a retrospective cohort study on efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Combined treatment using repurposed synthetic peptide desmopressin and bevacizumab as a potential antiangiogenic strategy in osteosarcoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic factors and survival outcomes in patients undergoing limb-sparing surgery for primary malignant bone tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Prognostic Factors in High Grade Osteosarcoma Patients Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Subsequently Underwent Surgery: Data from the Turkish Oncology Group.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Identification of MAEA protein as a potential target for chemoresistance in osteosarcoma using bioinformatics and proteomic analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Identification of the shared gene signatures in retinoblastoma and osteosarcoma by machine learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Developing a 3D bone model of osteosarcoma to investigate cancer mechanisms and evaluate treatments.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2024Article
- Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Adults with Osteogenic Sarcoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024Review
- Identification of New Potential Prognostic and Predictive Markers in High-Grade Osteosarcoma Using Whole Exome Sequencing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Clinicopathological correlations and prognostic insights in osteosarcoma: a retrospective analysis.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to examine the clinical results of patients who underwent medical and surgical treatment for osteosarcoma, to determine the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates, and to examine the effects of prognostic factors on these rates. PATIENTS AND
methodsBetween January 2005 and January 2020, a total of 64 patients (38 males, 26 females; mean age: 20.9±11.5 years; range, 6 to 70 years) who received medical and surgical treatment for osteosarcoma were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics, follow-up period, tumor location and size, tumor stage and necrosis rate, metastatic disease, surgical treatments, postoperative complications, local recurrence, and metastasis were recorded. The relationship of these factors with the survival was examined.
resultsThe median follow-up was 51.6 (range, 3 to 156) months. The most common tumor localization was in the distal femur with 42 (65.6%) patients and the most common histopathological subtypes were conventional osteosarcoma in 50 (78.1%) patients. The OS rates were 91.6% at one year, 65.9% at five years, and 51.6% at 10 years. With the exception of two patients who died during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, all patients underwent surgical treatment. The addition of chemotherapy + radiotherapy in the treatment did not provide any benefits in terms of survival and recurrence compared to the group that was not added, and the five-year OS rate was 79.3% compared to 20.7%, respectively. The overall 10-year survival rates were 83.9% and 37.2% in the group with a good response (≥90%) and poor response (<90%) to treatment (p=0.012). The mean survival time of three patients who presented with pathological fractures was shorter than the others (p>0.05). Surgical margin was ≤2 mm in 27 (42.2%) patients, >2 mm in 30 (46.9%) patients, and surgical margin was positive in five (7.8%) patients. The mean OS in the group with a surgical margin closure of >2 mm was 10.8±1.9 years and was longer than the other groups (p=0.047).
conclusionMetastasis at the time of diagnosis, <90% tumor necrosis, a tumor size of ≥10 cm, and metastasis development were significantly associated with poor survival and were found to be independent prognostic factors. The OS rate in the patient group with Stage III-IV response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy given the cisplatin + doxorubicin protocol was found to be better than those given the European and American Osteosarcoma Studies (EURAMOS) protocol. More research is needed to determine the most optimal chemotherapy protocols in this patient population. In addition, a multidisciplinary approach in treatment is of utmost importance to improve oncological outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.