Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36700229›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

The frequency of differentiated CD3

Nina Worel, Katharina Grabmeier-Pfistershammer, Bernhard Kratzer, Martina Schlager, Andreas Tanzmann, Arno Rottal, Ulrike Körmöczi, Edit Porpaczy, Philipp B Staber, Cathrin Skrabs and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Generation of effector CD4Stem cell reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Clinical significance of CD27Journal of ovarian research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Apheresis CD8International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. The magic of small-molecule drugs duringFrontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nina WorelDepartment of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Katharina Grabmeier-PfistershammerInstitute of Immunology, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Bernhard KratzerInstitute of Immunology, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martina SchlagerDepartment of Medicine I, Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Andreas TanzmannDepartment of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Arno RottalInstitute of Immunology, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ulrike KörmöcziInstitute of Immunology, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Edit PorpaczyDepartment of Medicine I, Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Philipp B StaberDepartment of Medicine I, Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Cathrin SkrabsDepartment of Medicine I, Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Harald HerknerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Venugopal GudipatiInstitute for Hygiene and Applied Immunology, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Johannes B HuppaInstitute for Hygiene and Applied Immunology, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Benjamin SalzerChristian Doppler Laboratory for Next Generation CAR T Cells, St. Anna Children´s Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria.
Manfred LehnerChristian Doppler Laboratory for Next Generation CAR T Cells, St. Anna Children´s Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria.
Nora SaxenhuberDepartment of Medicine I, Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Eleonora FriedbergDepartment of Medicine I, Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Philipp WohlfarthDepartment of Medicine I, Division of Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Georg HopfingerDepartment of Medicine I, Division of Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Werner RabitschDepartment of Medicine I, Division of Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ingrid Simonitsch-KluppDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ulrich JägerDepartment of Medicine I, Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Winfried F PicklInstitute of Immunology, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATSt Anna Children's Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell therapy targeting the B cell specific differentiation antigen CD19 has shown clinical efficacy in a subset of relapsed/refractory (r/r) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. Despite this heterogeneous response, blood pre-infusion biomarkers predicting responsiveness to CART cell therapy are currently understudied. Methods: Blood cell and serum markers, along with clinical data of DLBCL patients who were scheduled for CART cell therapy were evaluated to search for biomarkers predicting CART cell responsiveness. Findings: Compared to healthy controls (n=24), DLBCL patients (n=33) showed significant lymphopenia, due to low CD3 Interpretation: Low frequency of differentiated CD3

Indexed as

CD28 AntigensLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseAntigens, CD19CD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCell DifferentiationHumansAntigens, CD19CD28 AntigensbiomarkerCD27CD28chimeric antigen receptor T cells therapydiffuse large B cell lymphoma

Identifiers

PMID36700229
PMCPMC9868136
OpenAlexW4313895235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.