ArticleMedicine international
Value of DermaCheckup as a novel dedicated digital health solution for teledermatology.
Article in Medicine international. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of teledermatology for skin diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Daily healthcare is becoming increasingly costly and resource-intensive, requiring vast human and financial resources. The primary aim of the present study was to present the initial findings regarding the diagnostic accuracy of a novel telemedicine platform, DermaCheckup, when compared with face-to-face clinical appointments. The secondary aim was to assess whether patient management plans produced via this telemedicine platform differ from those decided upon following a face-to-face dermatological consultation. The difference in time to diagnosis between the tele-dermatology platform and standard care was also assessed. The DermaCheckup teledermatology service was implemented in March, 2020 as the COVID-19 pandemic emerged in the UK. The present study assessed patients who underwent a face-to-face clinical consultation, who, prior to visiting the clinic, used the teledermatology platform; thus, the diagnosis made via teledermatology was able to be compared to that made following standard care. Comparisons were made between diagnosis, process of diagnosis and the time to diagnosis. A total of 29 consecutive patients entering one UK dermatology clinic were included in the study. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in face-to-face visits being challenging, owing to the risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2. This limited the number of patients recruited into the study. The DermaCheckup application exhibited a very good level of agreement in terms of diagnosis with traditional face-to-face appointments. In the present study cohort, 93% of the patients could have been managed safely or referred immediately for a biopsy, thus avoiding a visit to the hospital. A substantial important improvement was also observed in the efficiencies that can be potentially achieved; the time to manage a patient decreased between 46-22-fold without considering the waiting time required between the time of organizing an appointment to the actual appointment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.