ArticlePhotoacoustics2023
Fast iterative reconstruction for photoacoustic tomography using learned physical model: Theoretical validation.
Article in Photoacoustics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Model-Based Joint Feature Fusion framework for limited-view photoacoustic tomography reconstruction.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Application of AIIR algorithm for quality improvement and noise reduction in pediatric abdominal contrast-enhanced CT.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
- TT-PADM: A Time-Driven Transformer Diffusion Model for Robust Sparse-View and Limited-View Photoacoustic Tomography.BME frontiers · 2026Article
- Performance characterization of light-emitting diode array-based photoacoustic computed tomography (LED-PACT).Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Model-informed deep-learning photoacoustic reconstruction for low-element linear array.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
- Maternal ECG-Guided Neural Network for Improved Fetal Electrocardiogram Extraction.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2025Article
- Quantitative photoacoustic tomography: modeling and inverse problems.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iterative reconstruction has demonstrated superior performance in medical imaging under compressed, sparse, and limited-view sensing scenarios. However, iterative reconstruction algorithms are slow to converge and rely heavily on hand-crafted parameters to achieve good performance. Many iterations are usually required to reconstruct a high-quality image, which is computationally expensive due to repeated evaluations of the physical model. While learned iterative reconstruction approaches such as model-based learning (MBLr) can reduce the number of iterations through convolutional neural networks, it still requires repeated evaluations of the physical models at each iteration. Therefore, the goal of this study is to develop a Fast Iterative Reconstruction (FIRe) algorithm that incorporates a learned physical model into the learned iterative reconstruction scheme to further reduce the reconstruction time while maintaining robust reconstruction performance. We also propose an efficient training scheme for FIRe, which releases the enormous memory footprint required by learned iterative reconstruction methods through the concept of recursive training. The results of our proposed method demonstrate comparable reconstruction performance to learned iterative reconstruction methods with a 9x reduction in computation time and a 620x reduction in computation time compared to variational reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.