Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36700132›Full record

ArticlePhotoacoustics2023

Fast iterative reconstruction for photoacoustic tomography using learned physical model: Theoretical validation.

Ko-Tsung Hsu, Steven Guan, Parag V Chitnis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Photoacoustics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ko-Tsung HsuDepartment of Bioengineering, George Mason University, VA 22030, United States.
Steven GuanDepartment of Bioengineering, George Mason University, VA 22030, United States.
Parag V ChitnisDepartment of Bioengineering, George Mason University, VA 22030, United States.
George Mason University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iterative reconstruction has demonstrated superior performance in medical imaging under compressed, sparse, and limited-view sensing scenarios. However, iterative reconstruction algorithms are slow to converge and rely heavily on hand-crafted parameters to achieve good performance. Many iterations are usually required to reconstruct a high-quality image, which is computationally expensive due to repeated evaluations of the physical model. While learned iterative reconstruction approaches such as model-based learning (MBLr) can reduce the number of iterations through convolutional neural networks, it still requires repeated evaluations of the physical models at each iteration. Therefore, the goal of this study is to develop a Fast Iterative Reconstruction (FIRe) algorithm that incorporates a learned physical model into the learned iterative reconstruction scheme to further reduce the reconstruction time while maintaining robust reconstruction performance. We also propose an efficient training scheme for FIRe, which releases the enormous memory footprint required by learned iterative reconstruction methods through the concept of recursive training. The results of our proposed method demonstrate comparable reconstruction performance to learned iterative reconstruction methods with a 9x reduction in computation time and a 620x reduction in computation time compared to variational reconstruction.

Indexed as

Deep learningImage reconstructionIterative algorithmLearned forward operatorNeural operatorPhotoacoustic tomography

Identifiers

PMID36700132
PMCPMC9867977
OpenAlexW4315853577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.