Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36700110›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2021

Generating tertiary protein structures via interpretable graph variational autoencoders.

Xiaojie Guo, Yuanqi Du, Sivani Tadepalli, Liang Zhao, Amarda Shehu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. De novo protein design by inversion of the AlphaFold structure prediction network.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. LAST: Latent Space-Assisted Adaptive Sampling for Protein Trajectories.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  10. From sequence to function through structure: Deep learning for protein design.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  11. Structure-based protein design with deep learning.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2021
    Review
  12. Protein Design with Deep Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaojie GuoDepartment of Information Sciences and Technology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
Yuanqi DuDepartment of Computer Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
Sivani TadepalliDepartment of Computer Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
Liang ZhaoDepartment of Computer Science, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2648-9989
Amarda ShehuDepartment of Bioengineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5230-4610

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Modeling the structural plasticity of protein molecules remains challenging. Most research has focused on obtaining one biologically active structure. This includes the recent AlphaFold2 that has been hailed as a breakthrough for protein modeling. Computing one structure does not suffice to understand how proteins modulate their interactions and even evade our immune system. Revealing the structure space available to a protein remains challenging. Data-driven approaches that learn to generate tertiary structures are increasingly garnering attention. These approaches exploit the ability to represent tertiary structures as contact or distance maps and make direct analogies with images to harness convolution-based generative adversarial frameworks from computer vision. Since such opportunistic analogies do not allow capturing highly structured data, current deep models struggle to generate physically realistic tertiary structures. Results: We present novel deep generative models that build upon the graph variational autoencoder framework. In contrast to existing literature, we represent tertiary structures as 'contact' graphs, which allow us to leverage graph-generative deep learning. Our models are able to capture rich, local and distal constraints and additionally compute disentangled latent representations that reveal the impact of individual latent factors. This elucidates what the factors control and makes our models more interpretable. Rigorous comparative evaluation along various metrics shows that the models, we propose advance the state-of-the-art. While there is still much ground to cover, the work presented here is an important first step, and graph-generative frameworks promise to get us to our goal of unraveling the exquisite structural complexity of protein molecules. Availability and implementation: Code is available at https://github.com/anonymous1025/CO-VAE. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at

Identifiers

PMID36700110
PMCPMC9710582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.