Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36700109›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2021

RibDif: can individual species be differentiated by 16S sequencing?

Mikael Lenz Strube

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Detection ofFood chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mikael Lenz StrubeDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby DK 2800, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0905-5705

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Metataxonomic analysis is now routinely used to profile the microbiome of virtually every ecological niche on planet Earth. The use of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), proposing to be the exact biological 16S rRNA amplicon sequences of a given biological system, is now considered the gold standard. However, the 16S rRNA genes, and in particular the amplicons derived from it, are not unique for most species nor are they necessarily unique within individual genomes. Despite these restrictions, individual ASVs are often used to make inferences on the state of a given ecosystem, which may cause erroneous conclusions on the effects of a given species on a specific host phenotype or ecosystem. Availability and implementation: RibDif is freely available along with source code and detailed documentation at https://github.com/mikaells/RibDif.

Identifiers

PMID36700109
PMCPMC9710640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.