ArticleBioinformatics advances2021
Mirage: estimation of ancestral gene-copy numbers by considering different evolutionary patterns among gene families.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- CORGIAS: identifying correlated gene pairs by considering evolutionary history in a large-scale prokaryotic genome dataset.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Mirage 2.0: fast and memory-efficient reconstruction of gene-content evolution considering heterogeneous evolutionary patterns among gene families.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Inverse Potts model improves accuracy of phylogenetic profiling.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Reconstruction of gene copy number evolution is an essential approach for understanding how complex biological systems have been organized. Although various models have been proposed for gene copy number evolution, existing evolutionary models have not appropriately addressed the fact that different gene families can have very different gene gain/loss rates. Results: In this study, we developed Mirage (MIxtuRe model for Ancestral Genome Estimation), which allows different gene families to have flexible gene gain/loss rates. Mirage can use three models for formulating heterogeneous evolution among gene families: the discretized Γ model, probability distribution-free model and pattern mixture (PM) model. Simulation analysis showed that Mirage can accurately estimate heterogeneous gene gain/loss rates and reconstruct gene-content evolutionary history. Application to empirical datasets demonstrated that the PM model fits genome data from various taxonomic groups better than the other heterogeneous models. Using Mirage, we revealed that metabolic function-related gene families displayed frequent gene gains and losses in all taxa investigated. Availability and implementation: The source code of Mirage is freely available at https://github.com/fukunagatsu/Mirage. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.