ArticleBioinformatics advances2021
Comparative genome analysis using sample-specific string detection in accurate long reads.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- SVDSS: structural variation discovery in hard-to-call genomic regions using sample-specific strings from accurate long reads.Nature methods · 2023Article
- Computational graph pangenomics: a tutorial on data structures and their applications.Natural computing · 2022Article
- Finding Maximal Exact Matches Using the r-Index.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Comparative genome analysis of two or more whole-genome sequenced (WGS) samples is at the core of most applications in genomics. These include the discovery of genomic differences segregating in populations, case-control analysis in common diseases and diagnosing rare disorders. With the current progress of accurate long-read sequencing technologies (e.g. circular consensus sequencing from PacBio sequencers), we can dive into studying repeat regions of the genome (e.g. segmental duplications) and hard-to-detect variants (e.g. complex structural variants). Results: We propose a novel framework for comparative genome analysis through the discovery of strings that are specific to one genome ('samples-specific' strings). We have developed a novel, accurate and efficient computational method for the discovery of sample-specific strings between two groups of WGS samples. The proposed approach will give us the ability to perform comparative genome analysis without the need to map the reads and is not hindered by shortcomings of the reference genome and mapping algorithms. We show that the proposed approach is capable of accurately finding sample-specific strings representing nearly all variation (>98%) reported across pairs or trios of WGS samples using accurate long reads (e.g. PacBio HiFi data). Availability and implementation: Data, code and instructions for reproducing the results presented in this manuscript are publicly available at https://github.com/Parsoa/PingPong. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.