Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699993›Full record

ArticlePain reports2023

Acute and subacute postsurgical pain in women with breast cancer: incidence and associations with biopsychosocial predictors-a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Alice Munk, Henrik Børsting Jacobsen, Julie Schnur, Guy Montgomery, Silje Endresen Reme

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04518085 (Pre- and Post-operative Psychological Interventions to Prevent Pain and Fatigue After Breast Cancer Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04518085 nacompletednot on this map

Pre- and Post-operative Psychological Interventions to Prevent Pain and Fatigue After Breast Cancer Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OsloRan2020 to 2023Enrolled203ConditionsPain, Postoperative, Fatigue, Breast CancerArmsMedical hypnosis, Internet-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (iACT), Mindfulness session, Treatment as Usual (TAU)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The MECDrug design, development and therapy · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Sex Differences in Pain and Its Treatment.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alice MunkThe Mind Body Lab, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Henrik Børsting JacobsenThe Mind Body Lab, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Julie SchnurCenter of Behavioral Oncology, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Guy MontgomeryCenter of Behavioral Oncology, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Silje Endresen RemeThe Mind Body Lab, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of Oslo · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Women who undergo breast cancer surgery risk suffering from postsurgical pain long after their surgery. Still, research on postsurgical pain in the subacute phase has been neglected. Objective: This study aims to investigate the incidence, intensity, unpleasantness, and presurgical predictors of acute and subacute postsurgical pain after breast cancer surgery. Methods: The study used an observational design through secondary analyses of the control group in a randomized controlled trial. Data from 102 women undergoing breast cancer surgery were included. Levels of acute and subacute pain intensity and unpleasantness were measured using 100 mm Visual Analogue Scales on the day of surgery and 4 weeks postsurgery. Linear regression analyses were performed to identify presurgical biopsychosocial predictors of acute and subacute postsurgical pain. Results: Average levels of postsurgical pain intensity and unpleasantness were as follows: 22.7 mm for acute pain intensity, 19.0 mm for acute pain unpleasantness, 10.3 mm for subacute pain intensity, and 11.7 mm for subacute pain unpleasantness. Pain expectancy predicted acute pain intensity (R Conclusion: Mild and moderate acute pain intensity and unpleasantness are common after breast cancer surgery, whereas levels of subacute pain intensity and unpleasantness are low. Pain expectancy predicts acute postsurgical pain intensity and unpleasantness, whereas expected social support inversely predicts acute postsurgical pain unpleasantness.

Indexed as

BiopsychosocialBreast cancerPain expectancyPostsurgical painPsychosocial factorsSocial support

Identifiers

PMID36699993
PMCPMC9833448
OpenAlexW4315709927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.