Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699841›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

A large bioassay identifies

Henry Tidd, Jason J Rudd, Rumiana V Ray, Ruth Bryant, Kostya Kanyuka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Henry TiddProtecting Crops and the Environment, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, United Kingdom.
Jason J RuddProtecting Crops and the Environment, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, United Kingdom.
Rumiana V RayDivision of Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Ruth BryantRAGT Seeds, Ickleton, United Kingdom.
Kostya KanyukaNIAB, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Rothamsted Research · GBNational Institute of Agricultural Botany · GBRAGT Seeds (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Septoria tritici blotch (STB) is one of the most damaging fungal diseases of wheat in Europe, largely due to the paucity of effective resistance genes against it in breeding materials. Currently dominant protection methods against this disease, e.g. fungicides and the disease resistance genes already deployed, are losing their effectiveness. Therefore, it is vital that other available disease resistance sources are identified, understood and deployed in a manner that maximises their effectiveness and durability. Methods: In this study, we assessed wheat genotypes containing nineteen known major STB resistance genes (Stb1 through to Results: The different Discussion: No single

Indexed as

bioassaycrop diseasedisease resistanceseptoria tritici blotchwheatZymoseptoria tritici

Identifiers

PMID36699841
PMCPMC9868401
OpenAlexW4313826440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.