Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699827›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Variation in scent amount but not in composition correlates with pollinator visits within populations of deceptive

Eva Gfrerer, Danae Laina, Marc Gibernau, Hans Peter Comes, Anja C Hörger, Stefan Dötterl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Floral Scents of DeceptiveEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eva GfrererDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Danae LainaDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Marc GibernauLaboratory of Sciences for the Environment, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) - University of Corsica, Ajaccio, France.
Hans Peter ComesDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Anja C HörgerDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Stefan DötterlDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
University of Salzburg · ATUniversité de Corse Pascal Paoli · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Floral scent is vital for pollinator attraction and varies among and within plant species. However, little is known about how inter-individual variation in floral scent affects the abundance and composition of floral visitor assemblages within populations. Moreover, for deceptive plants it is predicted that intra-population variation in scent can be maintained by negative frequency-dependent selection, but empirical evidence is still lacking. To investigate the ecological and evolutionary relations between inter-individual scent variation (

Indexed as

Arum maculatumfloral scent phenotypeintrapopulation variation in floral scent and pollinatorsnegative frequency-dependent selectionPsychodidaeSphaeroceridae

Identifiers

PMID36699827
PMCPMC9869488
OpenAlexW4313987291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.