Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699811›Full record

ArticlePsychology in Russia : state of the art2022

Working Remotely During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Work-Related Psychosocial Factors, Work Satisfaction, and Job Performance Among Russian Employees.

Ferdinando Toscano, Eleonora Bigliardi, Marina V Polevaya, Elena V Kamneva, Salvatore Zappalà

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology in Russia : state of the art, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. The Role of Psychological Time in Late Socialization. A SEM Analysis.Psychology in Russia : state of the art · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ferdinando ToscanoDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Italy.
Eleonora BigliardiDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Italy.
Marina V PolevayaDepartment of Psychology and Human Capital Development, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Elena V KamnevaDepartment of Psychology and Human Capital Development, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Salvatore ZappalàDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Italy.
University of Bologna · ITFinancial University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The spread of COVID-19 has forced organizations to quickly offer remote work arrangements to employees. Objective: The study focuses on remote work during the first wave of the pandemic and describes how Russian employees experienced remote work. The research has three main objectives: (1) to investigate the influence of gender and age on employees' perceptions of remote work; (2) to investigate the relationship between remote work and psychosocial variables, such as remote work stress, remote work engagement, and family-work conflict; (3) to examine whether and how much such psychosocial factors are related to remote work satisfaction and job performance. These objectives were the basis for developing six hypotheses. Design: A cross-sectional study involved 313 Russian employees. Data were collected using an online survey distributed in April and May 2020. The hypotheses were tested using ANOVA, correlations, and multiple linear regression analyses. Results: Women experienced more stress and more engagement when working remotely; older employees perceived remote work as a less positive experience; opinions about remote work and remote work engagement were positively related to remote work satisfaction; leader-member exchange (LMX) was a significant predictor of job performance. Conclusion: During the lockdown, remote work was perceived as a positive experience. We discuss some practical implications for organizations and managers.

Indexed as

family–work conflictleader–member exchangeopinions about remote workremote work engagementRemote work stress

Identifiers

PMID36699811
PMCPMC9845003
OpenAlexW4297833543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.