Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699801›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Risk Assessment and Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients of Medical Ward of Northwest General Hospital and Research Center, Peshawar, Pakistan: A Quality Improvement Project.

Muhammad Haris Shah, Muhammad Sajjad Khan, Shahzad Ahmad, Uzma Aftab, Aimal Khan, Wiqar Ahmad, Umar Iftikhar, Izaz Ahmad

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluating and Improving Knowledge of DVT Prophylaxis Among Healthcare Professionals at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan: A Quality Improvement Study.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad Haris ShahDepartment of Medicine, Northwest General Hospital and Research Center, Peshawar, PAK.
Muhammad Sajjad KhanDepartment of Medicine, Northwest General Hospital and Research Center, Peshawar, PAK.
Shahzad AhmadDepartment of Medicine, Northwest General Hospital and Research Center, Peshawar, PAK.
Uzma AftabDepartment of Medicine, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, PAK.
Aimal KhanDepartment of Medicine, Northwest General Hospital and Research Center, Peshawar, PAK.
Wiqar AhmadDepartment of Medicine, Northwest General Hospital and Research Center, Peshawar, PAK.
Umar IftikharDepartment of Medicine, Northwest General Hospital and Research Center, Peshawar, PAK.
Izaz AhmadDepartment of Medicine, Pak International Medical College, Peshawar, PAK.
Hayatabad Medical Complex · PKRawalpindi Medical University · PKNorthwest General Hospital and Research Center · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a condition that occurs when a blood clot forms in veins. Hospitalization increases the risk of VTE so timely risk assessment and adequate prophylaxis for VTE should be done to prevent this potentially fatal complication. Local problem Data from developing countries regarding VTE prophylaxis is scarce. VTE is a neglected area of research in Pakistan. So this closed-loop clinical audit was conducted to evaluate the VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis practices and to analyze the importance of educational intervention in improving the standard of care. Patients and methods We adopted the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for VTE prophylaxis as an audit standard. We collected data on a specially designed proforma by prospectively reviewing the hospital notes of patients in the Medical Ward of Northwest General Hospital and Research Center, Peshawar, Pakistan. Phase A included 60 patients and after educational intervention, Phase B was conducted with 90 patients. Intervention The results of Phase A were presented in the Clinicopathological Conference (CPC) meetings of the hospital. Healthcare workers were educated regarding the risks of VTE and the importance of timely prophylaxis. Posters were also displayed in the ward for highlighting the importance of VTE prophylaxis. Results In Phase A, only 5% of patients were risk assessed for VTE and of those eligible for prophylaxis only 22.2% received the prescription. Phase B showed a significant adherence to standard practices. In Phase B, 100% of patients were risk assessed for VTE and 75% received the prophylaxis. Conclusion There was poor compliance with standard VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis prescribing practices. However, a simple and effective educational intervention markedly improved patient care in terms of VTE strengthening the impact of clinical audits in the improvement of care.

Indexed as

clinical audit systemcritical care and internal medicinehospitalized patientspreventionquality improvement and patient safetyvenous thromboembolism (vte)vte prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID36699801
PMCPMC9870187
OpenAlexW4312184654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.