ArticleCureus2022
Test-Retest Reliability and Internal Consistency of the Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire Short Version in the Marathi Language.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Patient education specific to the disease must be incorporated into the management of coronary artery disease (CAD) or any other disease as the patients understand the education provided in their native language better. The brief version of the CAD education questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating patients' understanding of the condition. To the best of our knowledge and understanding from the literature review, no questionnaire evaluating the knowledge of CAD in the Marathi language had been found because of which this study was carried out. Methods For the process of translation and cross-cultural adaptation, the framework for self-report measures was taken into consideration in which qualified translators translated both ways forward into the Marathi language and backward into the English language. The translators and a recording observer combined their efforts to create one synthesized version. The questionnaire was fine-tuned by the expert group to produce the final version and 30 diagnosed cases of CAD were tested with the pre-final version. The Marathi version of the questionnaire's validity and reliability were evaluated using Cohen's kappa (k) and Cronbach's alpha (α). Results Thirty individuals with CAD were recruited (mean age 68±12.36, consisting of 22 males and 08 females) to test the pre-final version, and equivalence was tested for every item by probing the participants for the understanding of the item. The Likert scale demonstrated that patients understood the purpose of each question. A total of 200 participants - 153 males population and 47 females with a mean age of 66.64±5.6094 years who can read and speak in the Marathi language were considered to assess the test-retest reliability and internal consistency who completed the questionnaire twice, with a gap of two weeks but only 188 participant's data was analyzed as twelve participants dropped out of the study because they could not report due to transportation and health-related issues. The obtained α value demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency, while the k value indicated almost perfect agreement. Conclusion The study concluded that the Marathi version of the CAD education questionnaire short version is reliable and cross-culturally adapted; therefore, it is an effective tool for evaluating the knowledge of CAD among Marathi language-speaking patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.