ArticleCureus2022
Predictors of Failed Spinal Arachnoid Puncture Procedures: An Artificial Neural Network Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Knowing the predicting factors for difficult neuraxial blocks might help better plan the procedure. This study aimed to determine the predictors of failed spinal arachnoid puncture procedures using artificial neural network (ANN) analysis. Methodology With approvals, prospectively collected data from 300 spinal arachnoid punctures in the operation theater of an academic institute having postgraduate anesthesia training were retrospectively evaluated. Fifteen variables from anthropo-demographic, spinal surface anatomy, procedure, and performers' experiences were fed as input for the ANN. A failed spinal arachnoid puncture procedure was defined as the requirement of more than three punctures, with three punctures but more than six passes, or if the performer handed over the procedure to another, considering it difficult after the second puncture. STATCRAFT v.2 software (Predictive Analytics Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru, India) was used for ANN model generation. Considering the overfitting tendency of the ANN, Pr(>|
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.