Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699734›Full record

ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2023

Topological data analysis of thoracic radiographic images shows improved radiomics-based lung tumor histology prediction.

Robin Vandaele, Pritam Mukherjee, Heather Marie Selby, Rajesh Pravin Shah, Olivier Gevaert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Robin VandaeleDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Pritam MukherjeeStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Heather Marie SelbyStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Rajesh Pravin ShahVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Olivier GevaertStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Stanford University · USGhent University · BEVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

Multi-scale modeling of glioma for the prediction of treatment response, treatment monitoring and treatment allocationR01CA260271 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GEVAERT, OLIVIER · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
Radiogenomics Framework for Non-Invasive Personalized MedicineR01EB020527 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GEVAERT, OLIVIER · 2015 to 2018
$2.3M
Radiogenomics framework for non-invasive personalized medicineR56EB020527 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GEVAERT, OLIVIER · 2019 to 2019
$444k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA260271NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020527NIBIB NIH HHS R56 EB020527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Topological data analysis provides tools to capture wide-scale structural shape information in data. Its main method, persistent homology, has found successful applications to various machine-learning problems. Despite its recent gain in popularity, much of its potential for medical image analysis remains undiscovered. We explore the prominent learning problems on thoracic radiographic images of lung tumors for which persistent homology improves radiomic-based learning. It turns out that our topological features well capture complementary information important for benign versus malignant and adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma tumor prediction while contributing less consistently to small cell versus non-small cell-an interesting result in its own right. Furthermore, while radiomic features are better for predicting malignancy scores assigned by expert radiologists through visual inspection, we find that topological features are better for predicting more accurate histology assessed through long-term radiology review, biopsy, surgical resection, progression, or response.

Indexed as

computed tomographycomputer visionfeature engineeringhistologyradiologysupervised learningtopological data analysis

Identifiers

PMID36699734
PMCPMC9868648
OpenAlexW4311218864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.