Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699729›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022

Beatriz Santana Borges, Gislayne de Paula Bueno, Fernanda Tomiotto-Pellissier, Fabiano Borges Figueiredo, Lia Carolina Soares Medeiros

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. In Vitro Assessment of the Combined Activity of Amphotericin B and CuTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Novel Chalcone Derivatives as Anti-Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Beatriz Santana BorgesInstituto Carlos Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Gislayne de Paula BuenoInstituto Carlos Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Fernanda Tomiotto-PellissierLaboratory of Immunopathology of Neglected Diseases and Cancer (LIDNC), Department of Pathological Sciences, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Fabiano Borges FigueiredoInstituto Carlos Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Lia Carolina Soares MedeirosInstituto Carlos Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRFundação Carlos Chagas · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Leishmaniasis is a neglected tropical disease, with approximately 1 million new cases and 30,000 deaths reported every year worldwide. Given the lack of adequate medication for treating leishmaniasis, drug repositioning is essential to save time and money when searching for new therapeutic approaches. This is particularly important given leishmaniasis's status as a neglected disease. Available treatments are still far from being fully effective for treating the different clinical forms of the disease. They are also administered parenterally, making it challenging to ensure complete treatment, and they are extremely toxic, in some cases, causing death. Triclabendazole (TCBZ) is a benzimidazole used to treat fasciolosis in adults and children. It presents a lower toxicity profile than amphotericin B (AmpB) and is administered orally, making it an attractive candidate for treating other parasitoses. The mechanism of action for TCBZ is not yet well understood, although microtubules or polyamines could potentially act as a pharmacological target. TCBZ has already shown antiproliferative activity against Methods: Cytotoxicity assay was performed by MTT assay. Cell inhibition (CI) values were obtained according to the equation CI = (O.D treatment x 100/O.D. negative control). For Infection evaluation, fixated cells were stained with Hoechst and read at Operetta High Content Imaging System (Perkin Elmer). For growth curves, cell culture absorbance was measured daily at 600 nm. For the synergism effect, Fractional Inhibitory Concentrations (FICs) were calculated for the IC50 of the drugs alone or combined. Mitochondrial membrane potential (DYm), cell cycle, and cell death analysis were evaluated by flow cytometry. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid quantification were also determined by fluorimetry. Treated parasites morphology and ultrastructure were analyzed by electron microscopy. Results: The selectivity index (SI = CC50/IC50) of TCBZ was comparable with AmpB in promastigotes and amastigotes of Conclusions: Considering that TCBZ has the advantage of being inexpensive and administrated orally, our results suggest that TCBZ, combined with AmpB, is a promising candidate for treating leishmaniasis with reduced toxicity.

Indexed as

Antiprotozoal AgentsLeishmaniaLeishmaniasisAmphotericin BChildHumansLipidsTriclabendazoleAmphotericin BAntiprotozoal AgentsLipidsTriclabendazolebenzimidazolesdrug repurposingLeishmania amazonensisLeishmaniasistriclabendazole

Identifiers

PMID36699729
PMCPMC9868945
OpenAlexW4313909676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.