Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699726›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022

Ecological influence by colonization of fluoride-resistant

Yan Shen, Fangzheng Yu, Lili Qiu, Mengjia Gao, Puxin Xu, Lingjun Zhang, Xiangyan Liao, Min Wang, Xiangyu Hu, Yan Sun and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Synergistic inhibition ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Antimicrobial Potential of the Hop (Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yan ShenSchool and Hospital of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Fangzheng YuSchool and Hospital of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Lili QiuSchool and Hospital of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Mengjia GaoSchool and Hospital of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Puxin XuSchool and Hospital of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Lingjun ZhangSchool and Hospital of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xiangyan LiaoSchool and Hospital of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Min WangSchool and Hospital of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xiangyu HuSchool and Hospital of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Yan SunSchool and Hospital of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Yihuai PanSchool and Hospital of Stomatology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Wenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dental caries is one of the oldest and most common infections in humans. Improved oral hygiene practices and the presence of fluoride in dentifrices and mouth rinses have greatly reduced the prevalence of dental caries. However, increased fluoride resistance in microbial communities is concerning. Here, we studied the effect of fluoride-resistant Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) on oral microbial ecology and compare it with wild-type S. mutans in vitro. Methods: Biofilm was evaluated for its polysaccharide content, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging, acid-producing ability, and related lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), arginine deiminase (ADS), and urease enzymatic activity determination. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) were used to evaluate the S. mutans ratio within the biofilm. It was followed by 16S rRNA sequencing to define the oral microbial community. Results: Fluoride-resistant S. mutans produced increased polysaccharides in presence of NaF (P < 0.05). The enzymatic activities related to both acid and base generation were less affected by the fluoride. In presence of 275 ppm NaF, the pH in the fluoride-resistant strain sample was lower than the wild type. We observed that with the biofilm development and accumulative fluoride concentration, the fluoride-resistant strain had positive relationships with other bacteria within the oral microbial community, which enhanced its colonization and survival. Compared to the wild type, fluoride-resistant strain significantly increased the diversity and difference of oral microbial community at the initial stage of biofilm formation (4 and 24 h) and at a low fluoride environment (0 and 275 ppm NaF) (P < 0.05). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis revealed that fluoride-resistant strain enhanced the metabolic pathways and glucose transfer. Conclusions: Fluoride-resistant S. mutans affected the microecological balance of oral biofilm and its cariogenic properties in vitro, indicating its negative impact on fluoride's caries prevention effect.

Indexed as

Dental CariesStreptococcus mutansBiofilmsFluoridesHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceRNA, Ribosomal, 16SFluoridesRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sbiofilm shiftcariogenic virulencedental cariesfluoride-resistant strainoral biofilmStreptococcus mutans

Identifiers

PMID36699726
PMCPMC9868560
OpenAlexW4313827933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.