Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699721›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022

Research trends on the relationship between gut microbiota and colorectal cancer: A bibliometric analysis.

Weigen Wu, Yaobin Ouyang, Pan Zheng, Xinbo Xu, Cong He, Chuan Xie, Junbo Hong, Nonghua Lu, Yin Zhu, Nianshuang Li

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Weigen WuDigestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yaobin OuyangDigestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Pan ZhengDigestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xinbo XuDigestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Cong HeDigestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Chuan XieDigestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Junbo HongDigestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Nonghua LuDigestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yin ZhuDigestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Nianshuang LiDigestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC)is the third most common cancer in the world and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths, and over the past two decades, many of these researchers have provided a substantial amount of important information on the role of gut microbes in the development and progression of CRC. A causal relationship between the presence of specific microorganisms and CRC development has also been validated. Although a large number of papers related to this area have been published, no bibliometric study has been conducted to review the current state of research in this area and to highlight the research trends and hotspots in this area. This study aims to analyze the current status and future research trends of gut microbiota and CRC through bibliometric analysis. Methods: Publications from 2001 to 2022 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database and screened according to inclusion criteria. VOSviewer and CiteSpace software were used to visualize the research trends in this field, including the analysis of title, country, institution, author, number of publications, year of publication, number of citations, journal, and H-index. Results: A total of 863 studies were eventually identified, and the articles retrieved were cited an average of 44.85 times each. The number of publications on this topic has been increased steadily since 2011. China and the USA have made the largest contribution in the field. Conclusions: There has been a growing number of publications over the past two decades according to the global trends. China and the USA still maintained the leading position in this field. However, collaboration between institutions needs to be strengthened. It's commended to pay attention to the latest hotspots, such as "

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeBibliometricsChinaDatabases, FactualHumansbibliometric analysiscolorectal cancergut microbiotahot spotsresearch trends

Identifiers

PMID36699721
PMCPMC9868464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.