Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699623›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2023

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the fully automated active robotic system in robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Sanjay Bhalchandra Londhe, Santosh Shetty, Niraj L Vora, Ashit Shah, Rakesh Nair, Vijay Shetty

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanjay Bhalchandra LondheCriticare Asia Hospital, Andheri, Mumbai, India.
Santosh ShettyCriticare Asia Hospital, Andheri, Mumbai, India.
Niraj L VoraCriticare Asia Hospital, Andheri, Mumbai, India.
Ashit ShahCriticare Asia Hospital, Andheri, Mumbai, India.
Rakesh NairCriticare Asia Hospital, Andheri, Mumbai, India.
Vijay ShettyCriticare Asia Hospital, Andheri, Mumbai, India.
Columbia Asia · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Use of semi-active and active robotic system for performing Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing. The novel fully automated active robotic system performs milling of the bone surfaces with a high speed burr. The aim of the current study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the system in robotic assisted TKA (RA-TKA). Materials and methods: A single center clinical trial was conducted following 30 knees undergoing active RA-TKA for 6 months. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing RA-TKA for end stage arthritis. Patients undergoing conventional TKA and revision TKA were excluded from the study. Sample size was estimated to be 28 patients with α error of 0.05 and β error of 0.2 with power of study being 80. A pre-defined list of RA-TKA adverse events was employed to study the safety of the system. Efficacy was judged by comparing the planned versus achieved Implant size, alignment and limb alignment on post-operative radiographs. The post-operative clinical evaluation was done by an independent observer who was not part of the operating team. The primary safety and efficacy hypothesis was tested using a one sided Exact binomial test. The p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Pre-defined adverse events did not occur in any of the 30 RA-TKA (statistically significant p value < 0.001). The implant size accuracy was 100% (30 out of 30 knees) for femoral component and 96.67% (29 out of 30 knees) for tibial component (statistically significant, Chi-squared test, p value 0.0105 and 0.0461 respectively). The implant position and limb alignment was accurate in 100% of patients (p value < 0.001). Conclusion: Early experience of the use of fully automated active robotic system in TKA shows that it is safe and also is effective in achieving accurate implant size and implant/limb alignment.

Indexed as

EfficacyFully automatedRobotic assistedSafetyTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID36699623
PMCPMC9867974
OpenAlexW4316039428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.