Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699590›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Comparison of

Xuan Xuan Pu, Xiu Min Zhang, Qiu Shuang Li, Rong Wang, Min Zhang, Shi Zhe Zhang, Bo Lin, Bie Tan, Zhi Liang Tan, Min Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xuan Xuan PuDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, University of Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xiu Min ZhangCAS Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Qiu Shuang LiCAS Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Rong WangCAS Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Min ZhangDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, University of Guangxi, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Shi Zhe ZhangCAS Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Bo LinDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, University of Guangxi, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Bie TanDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, University of Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Zhi Liang TanDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, University of Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Min WangCAS Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Institute of Subtropical Agriculture · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNGuangxi University · CNHunan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Buffalo exhibits great efficiency in utilizing low-quality roughage, which can be due to the combined effect of host physiological feature and roughage diet fed. The present study was designed to compare the ruminal fiber degradation and the bacterial community attached to straws in buffalo and Holstein when fed with the same high-roughage diet using

Indexed as

bacterial communitybuffaloin siturumen ecosystemstraw fiber degradation

Identifiers

PMID36699590
PMCPMC9868309
OpenAlexW4313826215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.