ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022
Effect of different phosphate sources on uranium biomineralization by the
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pentavalent and tetravalent uranium formation via glycerol-stimulated bacteria in mine water.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Heterotrophic bacterial bioleaching and sequestration of uranium from mineral resources: a review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Biotechnological Potential of Extremophiles: Environmental Solutions, Challenges, and Advancements.Biology · 2025Review
- Impact of microbial processes on the safety of deep geological repositories for radioactive waste.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Industrial activities related with the uranium industry are known to generate hazardous waste which must be managed adequately. Amongst the remediation activities available, eco-friendly strategies based on microbial activity have been investigated in depth in the last decades and biomineralization-based methods, mediated by microbial enzymes (e.g., phosphatase), have been proposed as a promising approach. However, the presence of different forms of phosphates in these environments plays a complicated role which must be thoroughly unraveled to optimize results when applying this remediation process. Methods: In this study, we have looked at the effect of different phosphate sources on the uranium (U) biomineralization process mediated by Results and Discussion: It was clear that the U removal ability and related U interaction mechanisms by the strain depend on the type of phosphate substrate. In the absence of exogenous phosphate substrate, the cells interact with U through U phosphate biomineralization with a 98% removal of U within the first 48 h. However, the U solubilization process was the main U interaction mechanism of the cells in the presence of inorganic phosphate, demonstrating the phosphate solubilizing potential of the strain. These findings show the biotechnological use of this strain in the bioremediation of U as a function of phosphate substrate: U biomineralization (in a phosphate free system) and indirectly through the solubilization of orthophosphate from phosphate (P) containing waste products needed for U precipitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.