Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36699571›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2023

Coprophagy in moose: A first observation.

Robert Spitzer, Cecilia Åström, Annika Felton, Monica Eriksson, Erling L Meisingset, Erling J Solberg, Christer M Rolandsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Coprophagy in moose: A first observation.Ecology and evolution · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert SpitzerDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Umeå Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2753-1912
Cecilia ÅströmDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Umeå Sweden.
Annika FeltonSouthern Swedish Forest Research Centre Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Alnarp Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5066-1358
Monica ErikssonDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Umeå Sweden.
Erling L MeisingsetDepartment of Forestry and Forestry Resources Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research Tingvoll Norway.
Erling J SolbergNorwegian Institute for Nature Research Trondheim Norway.
Christer M RolandsenNorwegian Institute for Nature Research Trondheim Norway.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SENorwegian Institute for Nature Research · NONorwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coprophagy, the eating of feces, has been documented in a wide range of species but appears to be rare or difficult to detect in deer (Cervidae). Here, we report the first observation of coprophagy in moose

Indexed as

Alces alcescamera collarchronic wasting diseasecoprophagyforagingmoose

Identifiers

PMID36699571
PMCPMC9852938
OpenAlexW4317521144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.